By the way, though it's implied in my post, I didn't specifically say
that this is a midtier display issue -
I'm checking w/ our sys admins on the OS patch, though.
David D.
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:42:58 -0500
Reply-To: [email protected]
Sender: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
<[email protected]>
From: "Grooms, Frederick W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: DST and TZupdater on 601 - worklog timestamp ok,
other timestamps not
In-Reply-To: A<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
You applied the Solaris 9 OS patch for DST?
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Durling
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 10:35 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: DST and TZupdater on 601 - worklog timestamp ok, other
timestamps not
After applying the TZupdater patch from Sun, we noticed that the
timestamps for Work Log entries were correct, but timestamps for other
fields like the Create Date were still incorrect.
Dates in the Windows User Tool on a patched Windows PC are correct.
Is there something else that needs changin or updating, or did I
misunderstand the DST Technical Bulletin for 601?
http://documents.bmc.com/supportu/documents/87/91/68791/68791.pdf
The things mentioned were web services, export, & a couple of other
things we thought would not be big issues for us, but I do notice a
sentence that says, "...workflow processed on the BMC Remedy Mid Tier
might be one hour off..." on page 2, though I don't specifically listed
in 4 issues charted as problems for 6.0.1.
David D.
ARS 6.0.1 patch 1351, midtier patch 1353 Solaris 9, Oracle 9iR2, tomcat
4.1.30 with the tzupdate applied
--
David Durling 706-542-0223
Enterprise IT Services [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of Georgia
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers
Are"
