Yes it is a licensed BMC/Remedy product.  It is licensed to the server.  More 
than one developer can access it on the server.

Dave
--------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

----- Original Message -----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri Mar 30 18:08:14 2007
Subject: Re: Remedy Developer Plus

** 
Do I need some kind of license to use Developer Plus?
 
Michael Durrant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Share what you know.  Learn what you don't.

 

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Laura York
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 10:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remedy Developer Plus


** 

Michael,

 

Remedy Admin 7.0.0p2 was already installed when I installed RDP.  It works fine 
with objects/forms that don’t have a lot of workflow associated with it.  The 
form I’m having problems with is the SYS:Action form.  It runs for a while 
loading the objects then before it can complete it gets a “JVM need to increase 
the heap size in the registry” error.  I have increased the heap size to 1024mg 
and it’s still not enough.  Maybe this form is just too big for RDP to handle….

 

Laura

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Durrant, Michael M. - ITSD
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 5:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remedy Developer Plus

 

Laura,

 

    I just downloaded 6.3 today from the same place.  LJ Head suggested 
installing Admin 6, RDP, Admin 7 in that order.

 

    LJ also mentioned that RDP 6.3 might not be compatible with ARS 7.x objects 
- what has your experience been?

 

    Thanks Laura, LJ, and Warren for your feedback.  

 

Michael Durrant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Share what you know.  Learn what you don't.

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Laura York
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 2:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Remedy Developer Plus

** 

Hi Michael,

 

I have Remedy Developer Plus version 6.3 p1492 installed with Admin version 
7.0.0 p2 and it is working.  However, I have run into a problem with large 
forms that have lots of associated workflow, I keep getting a JVM error that 
says I need to increase the heap size in the registry.

 

What version of RDP do you have?  I found ver 6.3 in the patch download area of 
the BMC support site.

 

HTH,

Laura York

generationE Technologies

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Durrant, Michael M. - ITSD
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 3:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Remedy Developer Plus

 

Does anyone use this anymore?  Does it work with 7.x?  I tried installing it 
and it told me I didn't have an appropriate version of Administrator installed 
- I'm running 7.0.0 p2 - the latest and greatest as I understand.

 

Your feedback is most appreciated.  Thanks!

 

Michael Durrant
IT Systems Integration Analyst

Division of Information Technology
Idaho Department of Health and Welfare


 

 

The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential or 
otherwise protected from disclosure.  All persons are advised that they may 
face penalties under state and federal law for sharing this information with 
unauthorized individuals.  If you received this email in error, please reply to 
the sender that you have received this information in error.  Also, please 
delete this email after replying to the sender. 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential or 
otherwise protected from disclosure.  All persons are advised that they may 
face penalties under state and federal law for sharing this information with 
unauthorized individuals.  If you received this email in error, please reply to 
the sender that you have received this information in error.  Also, please 
delete this email after replying to the sender. 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential or 
otherwise protected from disclosure.  All persons are advised that they may 
face penalties under state and federal law for sharing this information with 
unauthorized individuals.  If you received this email in error, please reply to 
the sender that you have received this information in error.  Also, please 
delete this email after replying to the sender. 
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 

Reply via email to