Thanks, Rick!  Good idea!

Would anybody out there be willing to take a look at my setup and tell my why 
it isn't working?

Dwayne Martin

---- Original message ----
>Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 12:20:03 -0700
>From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
>Subject: Re: RESOLVED: $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff and ARERR 4568  
>To: [email protected]
>
>I don't know if you CAN, but I would suggest that you don't.  If you do, a
>copy of that goes to 2000+ recipients, 90%+ of whom don't want it.  Better
>to pick a few people with whom you've been conversing on a thread, and email
>them privately with it.
>
>Rick
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dwayne Martin
>Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 12:10 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: OT: RESOLVED: $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff and ARERR 4568
>
>While everybody is on the topic, I'm having a similar problem.  But before I
>submit it, can we attach MS Word documents to ARSLIST emails?  I'd like to
>send screen prints of my "Business Time Segments" entries, so you wonderful
>people can tell me if I have them set up right.
>
>Dwayne Martin,
>James Madison University
>
>---- Original message ----
>>Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:08:33 -0500
>>From: Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: RESOLVED: $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff and ARERR 4568
>>To: [email protected]
>>
>>The double quotes were the fix.  Thanks to everyone who responded.
>>
>>The double quotes were NOT required in version 5.1.2...they are now.
>>
>>Norm
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dwayne Martin
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:48 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff and ARERR 4568
>>
>>Kaiser,
>>
>>I'm trying to get this to work myself, so I'm not speaking as an 
>>authority, but do you want quotes around the two "$Assigned Group$"s?
>>Aren't they variables just like $Tech Start$?
>>
>>Dwayne Martin,
>>James Madison University
>>
>>---- Original message ----
>>>Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:23:56 -0500
>>>From: Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Subject: Re: $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff and ARERR 4568
>>>To: [email protected]
>>>
>>>   **
>>>
>>>   $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff $Tech Start$
>>>   $Tech Stop$ "$Assigned Group$" "$Assigned Group$"
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   ----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>   From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
>>>   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L. J. Head
>>>   Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:16 PM
>>>   To: [email protected]
>>>   Subject: Re: $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff and
>>>   ARERR 4568
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   Could you copy the exact runprocess here so we can
>>>   try to help?
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   ----------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>   From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
>>>   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser
>>>   Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE
>>>   Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 11:53 AM
>>>   To: [email protected]
>>>   Subject: $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff and
>>>   ARERR 4568
>>>
>>>   **
>>>
>>>   Hi everyone:
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   I've searched the list archives on this issue and
>>>   saw some discussion of this issue but no solutions.
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   Last week we upgraded our 5.1.2 server to 6.3 patch
>>>   21.  Ever since then users are getting ARERR 4568
>>>   any time they perform an action that requires a
>>>   business time calculation.  The exact error is...
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   ARERR [4568] The start or end time provided for the
>>>   command is not valid.
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   This occurs whenever a specific filter performing a
>>>   $PROCESS$ Application-Bus-Time-Diff function is
>>>   executed.  I can't figure out what's wrong.  It just
>>>   looks like a Remedy bug, especially considering the
>>>   application in question has run for the past two
>>>   years at four different sites with hundreds of users
>>>   and almost a million tickets without a hitch.  The
>>>   only change we made was upgrade the server, Java,
>>>   and clients.
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   Here's our environment specs:
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   Windows Server 2003 SP 2
>>>
>>>   Microsoft SQL 2000 SP 4
>>>
>>>   J2RE 1.4.2_14
>>>
>>>   J2SDK 1.4.2_14
>>>
>>>   Remedy ARS 6.3 patch 21
>>>
>>>   Remedy User client 6.3 patch 20
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>>   Any ideas?
>>>
>>>   Norm
>>>
>>>   __20060125_______________________This posting was
>>>   submitted with HTML in it___
>>>
>>>   __20060125_______________________This posting was
>>>   submitted with HTML in it___
>>>   __20060125_______________________This posting was
>>>   submitted with HTML in it___
>>
>>Dwayne Martin
>>Computing Support
>>James Madison University
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>_
>>_______
>>UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org 
>>ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org 
>>ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
>
>Dwayne Martin
>Computing Support
>James Madison University
>
>____________________________________________________________________________
>___
>UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
>Answers Are"
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________
>UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
>Answers Are"

Dwayne Martin
Computing Support
James Madison University

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to