There is but one truth in computing....it all sucks in some way.

-C-dub

ps - before you ask: SFOTINEF = So Far Off Topic It's Not Even Funny
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
  Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:00 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Linux Rules TOP 500 Supercomputers - Not a single Window$
supercomputer


  **
  I disagree with your statement that this list proves nothing, but that's
your right.
  When people ask me, in general: what is a more powerful OS, Windows or
Linux, I can point them to this list. See, I know no website or whatever,
that is vendor independent (free of interference or financial
assistance/support from a vendor) that answers this issue with sufficient
clarity and objectivity. For me, Microsoft, Novell or Sun or IBM marketing
is just sand in air.
  Maybe microsoft should get some nerds to tune windows!! :-)


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
  From: Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE
  Sent: Fri 06/15/07 4:34 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Linux Rules TOP 500 Supercomputers - Not a single Window$
supercomputer


  **
  Sorry, but that list proves nothing.  It’s just a list of, “Hey, here’s a
list of really big, cool, powerful computers.”



  How do I explain it? Nerds like Apple.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
  Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:21 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Linux Rules TOP 500 Supercomputers - Not a single Window$
supercomputer



  3 Macs made it to the list, and Macs are definitely geared towards
consumers, so how do you explain that?

  Mac OS X definitely has all the bells and whistles that a "consumer OS"
like Windows has. I would say Macs are geared towards consumers even more
than Windows.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE
  Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:26 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Linux Rules TOP 500 Supercomputers - Not a single Window$
supercomputer



  Much of the “bloat” you’re referring to, Pat, is a result of Microsoft’s
attempts to make an operating system that the average consumer wants.  The
average consumer wants 3-D user interfaces, high-definition graphics and
icons, windows that shrink and grow…blah blah blah.  It’s a bunch of eye
candy designed to wow the consumer.



  It’s called making something the customer will buy.



  Starbucks sells coffee because consumers want it.  If consumers suddenly
wanted lemonade, bet your bottom dollar Starbucks would trade in the
espresso makers for lemon squeezers.



  The solution? Don’t run server apps on Vista.  Run them on Windows 2003
Server.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
  Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 1:54 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: Linux Rules TOP 500 Supercomputers - Not a single Window$
supercomputer



  **

  you guys are funny..

  Ever heard of Bloat code.. M$ Defined the term.. I would love to hear the
justification on how I am going to make a system run faster, by creating
more code to run it. Everyone knows M$ is so big it could take a bath in
itself and not know it. Unix is small, configurable, and runs on small
pieces of code. (FAST). M$ runs like a 30K pound hog ! Just use common sense
folks..

  Solaris run with with less that 50Meg of OS ram. Vista uses only 2Gig..



  LOL



  On 6/15/07, Heider, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

  **

  Do you think they make a notebook version of those supercomputer?  ITSM 7
requires a lot of resources.  :)



  Stephen




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
  Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 12:24 PM
  To: mailto:[email protected]
  Subject: OT: Linux Rules TOP 500 Supercomputers - Not a single Window$
supercomputer



  **

  All,



  This is not directly related to the Remedy world, but since sometimes
listers ask what questions about Windows vs. Linux/UNIX, I thought this post
is then appropriate.



  Linux and UNIX are the undisputed champions in the supercomputer world.
There is not a single Windows supercomputer that made it in top 500
supercomputers list



  The top 500 supercomputers by OS family:



  http://www.top500.org/stats/28/osfam/



  The top 500 supercomputers by OS:



  http://www.top500.org/stats/28/os/



  This definitely must be a big embarrassment for Microsoft, that not a
single Window$ box made it to the top 500!



  Guillaume





  __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

  __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___




  --
  Patrick Zandi __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted
with HTML in it___

  __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___

  __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
in it___
  __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to