Perhaps I'm oversimplifying it-but from a 10,000 foot perspective, if what interests you is in SMS and what SMS can discover, why not just query SMS?
In regard to your question, "...how will you know when something leaves the company?" that's part of my point-SMS won't tell you that...at least not in many big enterprises. ________________________________ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:56 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Real-World Value of SMS & CMDB Well, the component and related information (installed HW and SW), if that's important to you, would be something discovery tools like SMS can give you. Even if you only want to track the workstation, how will you know when something leaves the company, or is added to the infrastructure (like an unauthorized laptop)? Rick ________________________________ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96 CS/SCCE Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 10:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Real-World Value of SMS & CMDB ** Hi everyone: I wanted to discuss the practicality issues of using SMS to populate the CMDB. I understand all (or virtually all) of the theory, but now I want to discuss the real-world practicality of it. By my estimation, the only real-world value I see in using SMS to populate the CMDB is that it saves someone from having to pound the keyboard to get system information into it. That's it. I've heard some folks talk about using SMS to identify deltas within the hardware inventory. That is, on Day 1, Dell Workstation 1 was discovered by SMS. On Day 9, Dell Workstation 1 is missing. That's a delta. An inventory manager can then be notified of that delta so that he can go figure out if Dell Workstation 1 got up and "walked away." But the way SMS is configured at most large sites, this would not work. In some configurations, items do not get removed from the SMS database until their machine account in the Active Directory is removed AND the machine fails to respond to polls for X amount of time. This does the enterprise no good in preventing, say, theft, as a thief does not request that the computer's machine account be removed from the Active Directory before he steals it! Theft prevention and loss prevention are two of the justifications in the total cost of ownership calculation, according to ITIL. But SMS alone won't get you there. You need something like RFID to truly identify instances of missing hardware. So what does SMS get you other than not having to pound a keyboard? Thoughts? Norm __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
