Appajee,

In an earlier email you said that you can use the 7.1 Java api to
connect to a 7.01 server

"What that means is -- the client program runs the pure Java code in
issuing AR API's underlying RPC calls when interacting with servers of
version 7.0 or greater"

Can the java plugin-server connects to a 7.01 server?


Since the 7.1 java api fallback to old JNI when connecting to version
6.3 or earlier, would it be a good practice to use the 7.1 java api to
write clients even when the server is an old version? I suspect the
7.api is more "Java" than the old one...

--
Jarl

On 8/14/07, Papolu, Appajee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Axton,
>
> While I cannot give you a pretty concrete statement about this, the
> general thinking is as follows:
>
> Yes, plug-ins can be developed using the first class SDKs - C or Java.
> Thus the plug-ins existing or newly developed with either language will
> be supported. While the above holds true for the plug-ins themselves,
> the plug-in server itself may be a different story though. Once we
> attain equal or better functionality/stability/performance goals, the
> plug-in server implementations in C and Java would simply be redundant
> -- thus I see the possibility of consolidating into only one plug-in
> server deliverable in future release(s). I am already seeing follow up
> questions on this comment, so here go few answers:
> 1. Did you not attain these goals yet?
> A. For most part yes, but not 100%. For example, we know that on Solaris
> - hosting C plug-ins in Java plug-in server, we ran into some stability
> issues especially if some other Java plug-in uses AR System native
> libraries (like Java API or CMDB API). In such environment, we encourage
> users to do side by side deployment of C plug-in server to host C
> plug-ins and Java plug-in server to host only Java plug-ins (& disable
> hosting any C plug-ins in it). Eventually we're hopeful that we'll
> resolve such limitations.
>
> 2. Any other issues?
> A. We would like to see the transition rate/ease for users from C
> Plug-in Server into the new Java plug-in server. Or, at least
> side-by-side deployment of both of them. Hopefully in 7.1 release we
> accomplish this smoothly.
>
> 3. Which plug-in server would stay (OR) which one will go?
> A. We implemented an all new implementation ground up now. So draw your
> conclusions. Any way, the eventual decision will greatly be helped by
> the readiness of users, rate of deployments of Java plug-in server and
> of course the elimination of rough edges in the Java plug-in server in
> all supported platforms.
>
> Your questions/comments/concerns/suggestions are welcome.
>
> Regards
> Appajee
>
> PS: Comments about future features/roadmap are just indicative of what
> our current thinking is; by no means it is set in stone and is pretty
> much subject to change depending on various factors.
>
> Another side note -- in future, I see the possibility of filter API
> plug-ins may indeed have SDK/mechanisms, so that they can indeed be
> created using other (Java hosting friendly languages) such as JRuby,
> Rhino/JavaScript, Jython and so on. As Filter API is the way to
> integrate 'scripted/custom logic' into AR app workflow, I believe
> opening it up for other languages is pretty powerful. (Lacking this,
> users with such needs will either give up or resort to cooking up their
> own plumbing code themselves.)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 7:24 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: AR System 7.1.00 delayed until end of August / early
> September
>
> With the new java api/plugin server, does the roadmap include ongoing
> support for both c and java plugins?
>
> Axton
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
> Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to