Requests for Enhancement (RFE) are logged through a support representative now. Just submit a support ticket with the enhancement request.
Thanks, -David J. Easter Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit BMC Software, Inc. The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 12:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Poll: Official support for the .NET API I migth be blind, but does not find the RFE on www.bmc.com/support. Where have you hide it? -- Jarl On 8/15/07, Papolu, Appajee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** > > > > John, Jarl, > > > > I thought I would respond to a couple of ARSLIST posts on this > thread... > > > > - Firstly, simply responding on ARSLIST is not sufficient to be > counted in the poll - so please do vote at > http://developer.bmc.com/jiveProd/forum.jspa?forumID=10 , if you're > interested in participating in this poll. > > > > - Secondly, if you have other ideas or suggestions on where we > should be going in terms of APIs, data representation formats, what > (sub)set of functions to be available in API etc - please send them > our way in the form of RFEs. By the way ARSWIKI is a great repository, > so you may place your requests there too. > > > > - Thirdly, even if you love (just as I do) the AR System Java API, > please do keep in mind that the question is NOT "whether you want this > API or that API". So, if you do not have a use case for using .NET > API, that is absolutely fine & feel free to say so with your vote. But > if indeed you bump into some use cases where you could use .NET > friendly APIs, then your choice can in fact be indicative of that > stance. So, stay objective in your participation in the poll about the > .NET API availability & official support topic alone. Kindly do not > interpret the poll with "Java Vs .NET" mindset or diverge the topic into > other subjective discussions. > > > > Regards > > Appajee > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Sundberg > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 1:33 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Poll: Official support for the .NET API > > > > ** I sort of think the whole conversation is going the wrong direction. > > I think BMC should create a rockin great version of Kinetic Link - > and expose everything as XML from the server itself. Then go ahead - > chose any language you want. (My preference - Ruby) > > The APIs only create/read/update/delete anyway. (Not like it does > active links etc...) Oh - and they get background server info - but I > just see that as read. > > -John > __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML > in it___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
