Lars: I think since the join form has a separate field (ID 1) not inherited from either base form, then the proper permissions must be manually applied to the join form's field ID 1.
Despite this, I agree with you that if a user has no access to a base form record, then the user should have no access to a derived join form record. Just my $0.02, --Phil ----- Original Message ---- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 8:55:44 AM Subject: Access question ** Hi list, suppose permissions are set so that a user can't access a ticket when searching directly in a form. No access to field 1. I have a joinform, users are able to see fields from this 'forbidden entry' in this join, unexpected, can't be as designed? L ars Pettersson Vattenfall Business Services Nordic AB Action Request System Engineer (Tabasco) S-461 88 Trollhättan Sweden Phone +46 520 888 35 Mobil +46 70 608 99 95 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
