Haven't checked on our DEV Solaris box, but on my PC's Local server, I get the same leaks even without any custom plugin loaded.
Arthur Axton Grams wrote: > > On Solaris 10, ARS 7.0.1 patch 3, I show these leaks with 1 custom > plugin loaded: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/remedy]$ ps -ef |grep arplugin |grep -v grep > remedy 5989 5983 0 12:50:19 ? 0:00 ./arplugin -s > sundev01 -i /usr/ar/sundev01 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /home/remedy]$ mdb -p 5989 > Loading modules: [ ld.so.1 libumem.so.1 libc.so.1 libuutil.so.1 ] >> ::findleaks > CACHE LEAKED BUFCTL CALLER > 0015e508 2 001df1d0 libnsl.so.1`_alloc_buf+0xe0 > 0015e508 2 001df338 libnsl.so.1`_tx_alloc+0x15c > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Total 4 buffers, 96 bytes >> > > Do you show all the leaks without any plugins loaded? > > Axton Grams > > On 8/24/07, arthurj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Without the custom plugin loaded, I used GlowCode on arplugin.exe to >> detect >> Native Memory Leaks and it reported 48 of them: >> >> Searching for native heap leaks ... >> >pipe.transact Native.FindLeaks 0 4 0x1 0 >> 7 leaks found in heap 0x140000 >> 1 leaks found in heap 0x240000 >> 0 leaks found in heap 0x250000 >> 37 leaks found in heap 0x320000 >> 1 leaks found in heap 0x3e0000 >> 2 leaks found in heap 0x40e0000 >> 48 leaks found in all heaps >> =ok >> True, a System.Boolean >> >pipe.transact info.ShowCrtHeaps >> 0x320000 msvcrt.dll >> =ok >> True, a System.Boolean >> Done. >> Look in NativeMemory tab of Summary pane for list of leaks. >> Sort list by clicking on Leak column in StackId pane. >> >> >> arthurj wrote: >> > >> > I have a custom ARDBC kind of plugin which I am testing on my Windows >> > system with 6.3 patch 20. >> > I notice that when I have workflow accessing the ARDBC plugin, using a >> > vendor form that is based on this plugin, in the logs I only notice >> > CreateInstance function getting invoked. >> > >> > Shouldn't ARS be also calling the DeleteInstance as well, once the >> > interaction is complete from the User tool? >> > >> > I also notice that the arplugin seems to be showing a growth in memory >> and >> > stays that way - from 18260K at the start of plugin service to 18580K >> > after my workflow accessed this plugin from a menu based on the >> > corresponding vendor form. Does this mean the arplugin service has a >> > memory leak problem? >> > >> > Arthur >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Custom-ARDBC-Plugin-tf4323437.html#a12312243 >> Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________________________________________ >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where >> the Answers Are" >> > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where > the Answers Are" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ARPlugin-service-memory-leaks--tf4323437.html#a12372798 Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
