Misi,

I was able to dump out the text file. I noticed it only had fields with
fieldOption 1. I assume I don't have any fields with fieldOption 2 or 3.
However, does it mean it doesn't dump out any fields with fieldOption 0? Or
it means every single fields are being audited? The later one can'e be the
case as the text file merely had about 50 fields. Or wait may be it is
auditing all the fields by default and the rest are display-only temp
fields? Anyways, either case, is it also possible to query the backend to
get the same information? I assume it'll  be available somewhere in the
databse.

Thank you,

Dave.


Misi Mladoniczky wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I think you can look at fieldOption in a def-file to find audited fields.
> 
> These are the values from api/include/ar.h:
> #define AR_AUDIT_NONE 0
> #define AR_AUDIT_COPY 1
> #define AR_AUDIT_LOG  2
> 
> fieldOption : 1 => audit
> fieldOption : 2 => copy
> fieldOption : 3 => audit+copy (1+2)
> 
> You can use our free rrrDefSearch utility for a quick search:
> C:\rrr\def> rrrdefsearch -s tmp.def -m fieldOption -v
> type    name subtype subid     subname    subattr         rowdata
> schema  test field   7         Status     fieldOption     1
> schema  test field   8         ShortDescr fieldOption     2
> schema  test field   536870913 Test1      fieldOption     3
> schema  test field   536870914 Test2      fieldOption     1
> 
> It can be downloaded from https://www.rrr.se/cgi/tools/main#rrrDefSearch
> 
>         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
> 
> Products from RRR Scandinavia:
> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
> * RRR|Translator - Manage and automate your language translations.
> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.
> 
>> Hello listers,
>>
>> I really need help with this. any help would be highly appreciated.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Dave.
>>
>>
>> Dave.ARSList wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello listers,
>>>
>>> Is there a way to get a list of all the fields you are currently
>>> auditing
>>> on any given form? Possibly details of what you are auditing? Also,
>>> let's
>>> say you are auding certain things on HPD:HelpDesk form; If i un-audit
>>> some
>>> of those fields, would it affect the existing audit-records? I mean
>>> would
>>> it drop all those columns or keep the previously-audited columns and
>>> insert null now as you are not auditing them anymore? How does it work?
>>> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> I's confusing because here's what we have on Audit tab of form
>>> properties
>>> of HPD:HelpDesk
>>>
>>> Audit Style: Log
>>> Enabled: Yes
>>> Log Form: HPD:HelpDesk_AuditLogSystem
>>> Qualification:  'TR.Priority' != 'DB.Priority'
>>>
>>> When i opened HelpDesk_AuditLogSystem form in user client: it only has
>>> one
>>> drop-down-> Staus! So does it mean the auditing is not enabled proper?
>>> Or
>>> should it be logging to HelpDesk_Audit form instead? How do I make sure
>>> what fields are being audited and where they are being logged and
>>> everything?
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Dave.
>>>
>>> P.S: I've already voted :p
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/HelpDesk-Audit-tf4571392.html#a13060243
>> Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
>> the Answers Are"
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where
> the Answers Are"
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/HelpDesk-Audit-tf4571392.html#a13062438
Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to