...Or ExpertDesk, http://www.expertdesk.com for that matter...On ITIL
compliance see: http://www.expertdesk.com/en_US/ITILcompliant.html.

(Yes there are more OTB AR System apps out there!)

Hugo

On 10/24/07, Gidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ** Stan,
>
> Where in your reply is there a Yes or No ?
>
> The fact that you are running on ARS does not imply ITIL anything.  Those
> of us that have been through
> ITIL verification and *actually* have a PE verified solution can attest to
> the fact that compliance is attainable,
> apparently you have not.
>
> You are sending the wrong message here and your diatribe is a disservice
> to any potential customers that are looking
> for a true ITIL verified solution.
>
> For a real alternative to an PE verified ITIL Compliant solution I would
> suggest your customers that a look at what we can
> offer instead:
>
> http://www.buoyantsolutions.net/ESS.html<http://www.buoyantsolutions.net/essaw.htm>
>
>
> Regards...Gidd
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Stan Feinstein
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 24, 2007 6:39 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Project Remedies will be at BMC UserWorld Vancouver.
>
> **
>
> Hi Gidd,
>
>
>
> When you read *Service Strategy*, the first book in the ITIL V.3. series,
> the first topic discussed on page 3 is transaction costs.  Simply stated,
> and the authors go into more detail starting on page 97, you want to know
> the cost for each request.  We know that there are 3 types of requests:
> small ones, medium-sized ones and large ones (i.e. projects).  There are 3
> elements of cost: resource cost i.e. time, expenses and asset cost.
>
>
>
> Since our ActionProgram Manager runs on the AR System server and includes
> time and expense tracking functionality for all Remedy-based tasks: help
> desk tasks, change tasks, project tasks (which are all related to requests)
> and "other" tasks not related requests, if you are using Remedy's Asset
> Management system (or a home-grown AR System-based asset mgt system or an
> asset mgt. system from another vendor that you have integrated with the AR
> System), you have all costs in one system.  The costs are tracked at the
> task level and you can relate each task to a request.  If you associate a
> revenue figure with the request (for example, the cost to install a PC is
> $100), since you also have the cost, you can approach a P&L statement for
> each request, and summarize to each type of request.  Since you know who the
> requestor is and the Business Unit they work for, you can also approach a
> P&L statement for each business unit IT is serving.  We call this a Demand
> Management or Service Request Management Framework, and you can find a
> datasheet about this on our home page (www.pri-us.com) or call me and I
> can discuss it with you and demonstrate it if you like, or come to
> UserWorld.  The datasheet has a helpful diagram showing all of this in more
> detail.
>
>
>
> By the way, if you do this, you also know what each person in IT is
> working on.  This is Resource Mgt. at the detailed level.  Our IT Project
> Portfolio Manager covers resource mgt. at a skills (macro) level.
>
>
>
> And this is why you want an integrated solution rather than a group of
> disparate products.  Disparate products will then require the timely and
> expensive integration project to bring all the data together, so that's why
> I say that getting MS Project Server or any other PM system for that matter
> is like shooting yourself in the foot.  It takes you away from understanding
> transaction costs rather than helping you understand transaction costs.
>
>
>
> This is what the authors of *Service Strategy* are talking about, and this
> is what our solution addresses.  That's all I'm implying.
>
>
>
> And by the way, thanks for asking.
>
>
>
> Stan
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Gidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Newsgroups:* public.remedy.arsystem.general
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2007 8:24: PM
> *Subject:* Re: Project Remedies will be at BMC UserWorld Vancouver.
>
> ** Stan,
>
> Are you implying that your solution is ITIL compliant?  or ITIL Version 3
> compliant for that matter ?
>
>
> Regards...Gidd
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Stan Feinstein
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 23, 2007 12:01 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Ad: Project Remedies will be at BMC UserWorld Vancouver.
>
> **
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
>
> If you are attending BMC UserWorld next week, please look me up.  I will
> be in Kiosk 30 on the exhibitor floor, and demonstrating our Remedy-based IT
> Governance Suite, which includes IT Project Portfolio Manager and
> ActionProgram Manager, and our Demand Management suite, which also includes
> Service Manager.
>
>
>
> 2 new white papers are on our home page, www.pri-us.com.  One is on ITIL
> Version 3 and Managing Transaction Costs.  The other is on Leveraging
> Investments: in Remedy as well as in your IT Governance Suite.  It is
> sub-titled: You Could License a Standalone IT Governance Suite, But Why
> Would You Want To.  Taking off on David Letterman, it lists many more than
> 10 reasons for using an integrated solution.
>
>
>
> The other white papers are on Aligning Resources and Business Priorities,
> and Bug Reporting, which an example of a cross-application, cross-department
> process that becomes trivial to develop and implement when using an
> integrated solution.
>
>
>
> I look forward to seeing you in Vancouver.  It should be a lot of fun.
>
>
>
> Stan
>
>
>
> Stan Feinstein
>
> President
>
> Project Remedies Inc.
>
> www.pri-us.com
>
> 310-230-1722
>
>
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
> it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML
> in it___
>
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
> it___
> __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
> it___
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to