Michelle,

 

I am not aware of any bug defect with this.  Since this "bug" will go
away in 3 days anyways I hadn't planned on submitting a bug report.

 

BTW, because of the nature of dates and time changes, moving forward I
plan to always set dates to character fields before sending to SQL.
This way, it shouldn't matter when the time changes.  

 

BTW #2, I recently read somewhere online that the Act that changed DST
time in the US has a clause that allows Congress to revert back to the
original DST time if they want to.  When/if that happens then ARS, Java,
OS's and other programs will need to be modified once again.  T-Shirt
idea:  Just say 'No' to Daylight Saving Time

 

Stephen

Remedy Skilled Professional

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michelle L
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible DST Issue

 

** 
Hi, Stephen: 

Thank you for the workaround and passing this along to the masses.  Is
there already a defect id for this? 

Thanks, 
Michelle 



"Heider, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)"
<[email protected]> 

11/02/2007 07:37 AM 

Please respond to
[email protected]

To

[email protected] 

cc

 

Subject

Re: Possible DST Issue

 

 

 




** 
Just wanted to pass this along... 
  
ARS 6.3 p22 (server, mid-tier, user tool),  SQL Server 2000 (all
patches), Windows Server 2003 (all patches). 
  
When passing a date in a date field within an active link to a Set
Fields SQL User Defined Function Remedy changes the date to the previous
day.  This only occurs for dates starting this last Sunday through this
coming Sunday. 
  
The work-around is to set the date field to a tmp character field first,
then pass the tmp character field to the SQL user defined function. 
  
HTH 
  
Stephen 
Remedy Skilled Professional 
  

 

________________________________


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 5:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible DST Issue 
  
Wow! That's weird. Does that happen from the native client too? 
  
Just for information purposes - what if you save it on the mid tier and
then view the record from the mid-tier? What is the date displayed as?
Also if you save from the native client does it display it correctly on
the mid-tier? 
  
Joe 
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Suwanski, Ron
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 4:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Possible DST Issue 
** 
Yes I saw it too.. but it was only for 11/1/2007.  If you try 11/2/2007
it is fine.. 
  

 

________________________________


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Caruso
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 12:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Possible DST Issue 
** ARS 6.3 p20 Solairs\Sybase
MidTier p20 Apache\TomCat
TZ:EST

Have a form with a date (not date time) field. User enters the date
11/01/2007. When they save the record the MidTier is changing the date
to 10/31/2007. I was not able to find any way of setting 11/1/2007 in
that field. Also, if I enter the date as "11/1/2007 4:00:00 PM" it puts
11/0/2007 as the date. 

Anybody else seeing this scenario?

Thank you

Frank 

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
HTML in it___ 


======================================================================
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in and transmitted
with this communication is strictly confidential, is intended only for
the use of the intended recipient, and is the property of Countrywide
Financial Corporation or its affiliates and subsidiaries. If you are not
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of the
information contained in or transmitted with the communication or
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited by law. If you have received this communication in
error, please immediately return this communication to the sender and
delete the original message and any copy of it in your possession. 
======================================================================

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the 
Answers Are"

Reply via email to