What it really comes down to is courtesy.  This is a list that is read by 
professional men and women of various cultures and religions from around the 
world.  What some find as humorous may not be to others for several different 
reasons.

Dave
--------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

----- Original Message -----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu Dec 06 22:06:04 2007
Subject: Re: Friday Humor (U)

** 

I’m going to ask a question that crossed my mind when I first read the comment 
from Sandra but I thought better of it at the time: What would the 
powers-that-be where anyone on this list works consider objectionable? The mild 
innuendo in my joke, the profanity in the joke prior to mine or both?

 

Will, I like your idea and it makes sense but I’ve worked places where 
circumventing the IT department’s security, i.e. by going through a tunnel to 
an outside mail server, was much worse of an infraction than using the F-word 
or more imaginative innuendo in email. In fact, I’ve worked places where people 
got reprimanded for sending passwords in email or for restoring a hacked 
website before the IT forensics team got to take a look at it. I also would 
have to wonder what the culture must be like in a company where _receipt_ of a 
message on a publicly accessible message board that fell into the company’s 
“objectionable” policy range was cause for reprimand. Does this mean that 
someone could get a person they didn’t like inside the company fired by 
spamming them with the types of ads none of us really like to get in our 
inboxes? I certainly find many of those objectionable.

 

Sandra and Gary, I take your point and I apologize if the joke offended you or 
anyone else on this list. However, perhaps a private message would have been 
more effective. Publicly pointing out a person’s mistakes in a forum such as 
this may not be the most salient approach.

 

J.T. Shyman

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Will Du Chene
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:19 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Friday Humor (U)

 

I admit to being a bit curious... I am not trying to drag out the topic, but am 
just plain curious... 

In these environments, what are the "guidelines" for using the internet? I 
mean, can you surf out to a webmail site and view the contents of the list from 
an account such as Yahoo! Mail, or GMail or Hotmail? What about viewing the 
archives from one of the various sites that offer them?

It's been my experience that most mail administrators are... well... Sort of 
like Smigel when it comes to the ring. All email is their "precious" data and 
they don't want it to go anywhere. Email is generally journaled, and even 
threaded so that the powers that be can browse a conversation chain on a whim. 
I don't know if routing professional list traffic to a webmail account would 
help your situation or not, but it might be an easy way to get around the 
"precious data" syndrome that converts mere mortals if you know what I mean. 

Another option is to run your own mail server(s), which is what I do. I am 
currently running Citadel (www.citadel.org <http://www.citadel.org/> ) behind 
an STunnel (www.stunnel.org <http://www.stunnel.org/> ) server to provide an 
SSL layer between the browser and the server. It works like a charm.

 

 

Thu Dec 06 2007 10:36:58 PM UTC from Opela, Gary L Contr OC-ALC/ITMA to 
[email protected] 

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [ReplyAll] [Forward] [Headers][Print]

Subject: Re: Friday Humor (U)

And in order to prevent receiving a second offense, one must notify the
source of the objectionable content in question lest the offender is
left unbeknownst to the offense -- hence Sandra's request.

Thanks,


Gary Opela, Jr

Sr. Remedy Developer

Leader Communications, Inc.

405 736 3211


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System dis

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ 
__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___

Reply via email to