Brian, both scenarios will use the escalation queue, and in 6.3 only one thread. Scenario 2 will have an overhead in terms of filter counts, plus also roll back. If any one of the records fail then the whole process will roll back.
Sam From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Goralczyk Sent: Friday, 21 March 2008 11:01 a.m. To: ARSList Subject: Re: Efficiency question ** It is my understanding that the first process would happen quicker because the escalation is only running on one record. It does however require one aditional step. The reason for the display only field is so that the form will record an update and start the filters firing. It is running unqualified because I want it to fire on every record. So you are correct in that assumption. Am I wrong in my assumption that having the escalation run on one record that then fires a filter to every record in another form would cause the second action to become multi-threaded? The intention here is to cause the server to fire on as many LDAP records as possible as quickly as possible. The LDAP form is the slowest piece of the process. By FAR!! Brian Goralczyk _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
