Hi All, I'm trying to figure out how best to map some "relationships" in the CMDB. If anyone has any guidance if would be appreciated.
Scenarios: We have two switches, both considered in-use at any point in time. They are considered peers in one sense, but in another, one of the switches is considered the primary switch for a business service, in the event there is a problem with it, the second switch is considered the primary switch for the business service. If you have this scenario, how have you mapped it in the CMDB, in terms of the relatioship between the switches to acknowledge this configuration? On a similar vein, How have others mapped software clusters where there is a active/passive configuration? Have you had to add data attributes at the CI layer to describe these scenarios more crisply, or have you used OOTB relationship types or added your own. Thanks, Kevin _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
