My understanding of the view form (based on discussions with remedy
instructors) is that it does not cache the information, so accessing the
form is the same as making a sql call, you're just not doing the SQL
logic against the information until it exists locally.  I would love for
someone to refute this, as I would prefer 1-2 hour caching over
real-time calls.

-Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nall, Roger
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 11:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Active Link After Submit Instead of Filter

How about creating a View form to your view in the external db? Then you
do not need a SQL call.

HTH,

Roger A. Nall 
Manager, OSSNMS Remedy 
T-Mobile, USA 
Desk: 813-348-2556 
Cell: 973-652-6723 
FAX: 813-348-2565 
sf49fanv AIM IM 
RogerNall Yahoo IM 
-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Blasquez
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 2:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Active Link After Submit Instead of Filter

Hello,

I have a custom 6.3 Remedy implementation which is used by our Netcool
monitoring system to open tickets based on certain events.  The netcool
remedy gateway is used to push a few fields to Remedy and open a ticket,
then the Request ID is passed back to netcool and used for future
updates to the event.  All of this works just fine.

The issue I am seeing is that after Remedy receives the fields and the
ticket is saving, I fire 2 filters to pull data out of an external
database via a SQL call over a view in the local Oracle DB.  This call
can sometimes time out.  When it does, this causes the netcool gateway
to receive an ARERR 92 and a request ID is never created.

I am trying to work around this by doing the filter actions with an
active link that fires after submit.  I have tried it with both set
field alone and with a set field then a push field of matching IDs to
the same request ID.  Neither of these methods have worked.  Although
the ticket opens fine, the SQL results are not pushed to the fields.

Once again, the priority is that netcool receives a request ID in an
action that is separate from the SQL call.  I realize that an 1-2 minute
escalation could accomplish this but I don't like that from a
performance standpoint.

Any input is appreciated, thanks!

____________
Paul Blasquez
Senior Network Engineer/Remedy Developer | 
Desk - 408.360.5220 | 
Cell - 408.627.5714

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to