Oh, forgot to mention:  set up an escalation to initially fill the values --
then use the workflow afterward.
a one time run.

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM, patrick zandi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> How about an extra field instead.
> Why not just add a Search "value". When the form is saved, (filter) and it
> meets the below Qual, Unset the field or set field to the value S1 or even
> use Selection Field Like I have.
>
> What I did was put in a Selection field
> Search  O Type 1  O Type 2  O Type 3  O Type 4
> Each selection field is on when it meets the qual for the query.
> (in this case they need to different)
> The when you do a query it is based on the = and not the !=
>
> -- Hope I am making sense.. It just depends on how many you need..
> Maybe a Character field with 2 values - Your own Index so to speak.
> Then you have 99 choices - which means no need for an index.
>
> Just a thought.
> It is just Workflow Dependent. I have used this before and it was amazingly
> fast.
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Robert Halstead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> ** Ladies and Gents,
>>
>> We have been constantly trying to improve performance on a form with over
>> 1 million records in it by analyzing indexes, or clearing the statistics for
>> the table in oracle.  The last thing we did was clear the statistics for our
>> form BZ:Incident because for some reason searches in Remedy, even though we
>> were searching on index fields, were not using the indexes in Oracle.  By
>> clearing the statistics, I believe we're forcing oracle the use the indexes
>> resulting in the searches .  However, searching on a field that is not
>> indexed now performs a database time out error in Remedy.
>>
>> My question:  Where is the happy place?  When you guys analyze statistics,
>> to what percent?  Also, how often do you find yourself analyzing indexes?
>>
>> On a related question, performing searches in Remedy using the != operator
>> does not utilize the index for that specific field.  I'm performing a search
>> on a form where 'Parent' = $NULL$ and 'Link Type' = $NULL$ and 'Incident ID'
>> != $tmp_IncidentID$.  Essentially I'm wanting to return all tickets that are
>> not associated with a parent and not return the incident I'm trying to
>> link.
>>
>> How would I change this query so that I utilize the indexes?  The search
>> seems to perform a full table scan against the table in oracle.  All three
>> fields are indexed on the form.
>>
>> I sure that this is covered in the Performance and Tuning class, I just
>> have yet to take it.
>>
>> Environment:
>> AR System 6.3 Patch 20
>> Oracle 9i
>>
>> --
>> "A fool acts, regardless; knowing well that he is wrong. The ignoramus
>> acts on only what he knows, but all that he knows.
>> The ignoramus may be saved, but the fool knows that he is doomed."
>>
>> Robert Halstead __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the
>> Answers Are" html___
>
>
>
>
> --
> Patrick Zandi
>
> Dev Technology Group --> www.devtechnology.com
> Exceeding your Expectations ! By Design...




-- 
Patrick Zandi

Dev Technology Group --> www.devtechnology.com
Exceeding your Expectations ! By Design...

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to