Hi, Rick:

I think you have the gist of what everyone's saying.  You already know 
that it is more efficient to point that escalation at the group form where 
groupId=0 or 1...or whatever.  I believe your question was related to the 
error messages you're receiving.  And although you understand that there 
are different options for building the escalation, the point is that the 
escalation fires in other environments without error.

Since I've seen this behavior before, I have to ask.  This server doesn't 
happen to be a part of a server group, where it is possible that the 
escalations attempted to run on more than one server did it?  A similar 
phenomenon occurred here.  We didn't usually see the Entry does not exist 
in database error on this particular escalation that runs nightly; so we 
knew something was wrong.

We found that the error was occurring in the arerror.log of one of the 
servers and not in the other.  We then found that for whatever reason 
during the last update, the "Disable Escalations" configuration setting 
was unchecked on two out of three of our servers.  In our case, two 
servers should have that option checked.

The same thing happened with Archiving.  It should only be enabled on one 
out of three of our servers.

Not sure if that helps or not.

Thanks,
Michelle



Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)" 
<arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
05/29/2008 03:33 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: Application-Delete-Query-Entry gives errors [pjm]






** As I understand it, using the call I'm using, 
(Application-Query-Delete-Entry) is more efficient for multiple deletes 
than Application-Delete-Entry.  I haven't tested that, but it seems to 
make sense.  It is like deleting a list of entries on your screen at once 
instead of one at a time.  At very least, it should cut out the GLE call 
to refresh the entry list after each delete.

Rick

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Craig Carter <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
** 
True?but as Fred mentioned, you are calling the full delete for every 
record.  If you put the qualification in the Run If and delete them using 
request id and Application-Delete-Entry, it may solve your problem.
 
Craig Carter
Software Engineer, RSP
 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 2:07 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Application-Delete-Query-Entry gives errors
 
** No, that's on Application-Delete-Entry.  The syntax for 
Application-Query-Delete-Entry is Application-Query-Delete-Entry "<form>" 
<qualification_string>.

Rick
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Craig Carter <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
** 
I believe you have to use the Request ID field with this command.  Since 
you are not providing that, you get the entry error.
 
Craig Carter
Software Engineer, RSP
 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 1:52 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Application-Delete-Query-Entry gives errors
 
** We are running an escalation nightly that runs this command:  
Application-Query-Delete-Entry "SHR:TmpMessages" (( 'Status' = "Sent") AND 
( 'Send Time' !=  $NULL$ )).  The effect is to clear a form that contains 
records accumulated during the day, but which are no longer needed.


Running this creates thousands of entries in the arerror.log file 
(roughly, but not exactly, equivalent to the number of records in the 
form) that say this:  Thu May 29 10:31:45 2008  390603 : Entry does not 
exist in database (ARERR 302).

There are no errors that show up in the api or sql logs, and the records 
DO get deleted.  Any idea why these errors appear?  I'm kinda stumped as 
to where else to look for a cause.

Rick
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" 
html___ 
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" 
html___ 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" 
html___ 
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" 
html___ 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" 
html___ 


======================================================================

Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in and transmitted with this 
communication is strictly confidential, is intended only for the use of the 
intended recipient, and is the property of Countrywide Financial Corporation or 
its affiliates and subsidiaries.  If you are not the intended recipient, you 
are hereby notified that any use of the information contained in or transmitted 
with the communication or dissemination, distribution, or copying of this 
communication is strictly prohibited by law.  If you have received this 
communication in error, please immediately return this communication to the 
sender and delete the original message and any copy of it in your possession.

======================================================================


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to