cool. thanks! On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Danaceau, Chris < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ** Bob we used "Connectivity Segment" Here's a sample Product > Categorization record. > > > CI Type CatSchemaKey Product Categorization Tier 1 Product > Categorization Tier 2 Product Categorization Tier 3 Connectivity Segment > BMC_CONNECTIVITYSEGMENT Connectivity Circuit 56K > > > This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and solely for the > intended addressee(s). Do not share or use them without Fannie Mae's > approval. If received in error, contact the sender and delete them. > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *ARS Bob > *Sent:* Monday, July 21, 2008 2:04 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* CMDB class for circuits? > > ** Any suggestions for a solution for representing data circuits in CMDB > that doesn't involve making whole new classes? > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > html___ > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > html___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
