I think those are only examples. Any value greater than 1 should be valid (not sure of the max.), just as it is for the Impact/Priority fields in Incident Mgmt. Do test the results of your values before you implement them.
Rick ----- Original Message ----- From: Chowdhury, Tauf Newsgroups: public.remedy.arsystem.general To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 7:18 AM Subject: ITSM 7, CHANGE MANAGEMENT - RISK QUESTIONS ** All, I was wondering if anyone has tried configuring different values for the Risk Weight field. You will see in the attachment there are only 20,40,60,80,100 as values. Has anyone tried to enter say, 10, 30, 50 and see if the algorithm picks it up? Any info would be helpful. Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc. Sr. Analyst Informatics Office: 631.858.7765 Mobile:646.483.2779 P Please consider the environment before printing this email ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
