I'm not looking to have a replica of the database... I want a separate SERVER instance using the same database
Webster, Basil wrote: > > We used to have this type of config on a reporting server before. One AR > server was updated weekly (SQL restore) and the other monthly. > > I our case there were only read actions happening. The server that it > was on was not a very wow machine (2 x 2ghx CPU, 4 gb RAM) and it > handled it. At the time our DB was at it's largest 80 gb. We used a 3rd > party app as a scheduler which called Crystal reports. We have long > since gone the business objects route so have broken the multi AR > server. > > What are you looking at using your server for? Is the server the app and > db server altogether? What DB sizes are you looking at? You can always > put the screws on at db level to use certain cpu's or only a limited > amount or RAM (depending on the functions). > > > Kind Regards, > Basil > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Icarus4 > Sent: 12 September 2008 15:05 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Multiple Instance of ARS 6.3 on Shared database > > Hello listers, > > I'm considering installing multiple instance of ARS 6.3 on the same box. > Instances will share the same database. > > Anyone did a performance comparison between single and multiple > instances? > Does it bring a better usage of the server resources? > > Thanks for sharing. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Instance-of-ARS-6.3-on-Shared-database-tp > 19414834p19414834.html > Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > _______ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > ________________________________________________________________________________________ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and is intended solely for > the addressee. > If you have received this e-mail in error, you are hereby notified that > any review, > copying or distribution is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender > immediately > and destroy the original. Siemens Limited and/or its subsidiaries accepts > no liability > of whatever nature for any loss, liability, damage or expense resulting > directly or > indirectly from access to this message and any files or links that are > attached hereto. > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Multiple-Instance-of-ARS-6.3-on-Shared-database-tp19414834p19508706.html Sent from the ARS (Action Request System) mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
