We went with 10g for the same reasons and then just modified a lot of
workflow to turn everything into caps before it went to the DB.  Then we
also modified the searches to make then case insensitive as well.  All
the Admins who put data in just know to do all caps.  We basically just
do IM, PM, CHG etc...

 

Kevin Begosh

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott Parrish
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 12:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g vs. SQL 2005 for supporting ITSM 7.1

 

** 

John,

Just be very, very careful here. Obviously, seeking the opinion of
professionals is the way to go (having a conversation with your internal
DBAs) but DO NOT underestimate the effect that case sensitivity will
have on your user community, especially with regards to searches. Your
DBAs may tell you that you can turn case sensitivity OFF in Oracle 10g,
but the AR System cannot access the database efficiently with case
sensitivity turned off (I believe it will always do a full table scan
when searching with case sensitivity turned off). Therefore, you will be
relegated to either entering everything in your database in ALL CAPS,
all lowercase or telling your users that when they search in the
database they MUST KNOW how the data was entered to search against it.

 

Just my .02 cent warning. We had a client that wanted to go with 10g for
many of the same reasons you did, then, after installation, decided that
the case sensitivity issue was much more important the previously
thought.

 

Scott Parrish

IT Prophets, LLC

(770) 653-5203

www.itprophets.com

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bilinski, John
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 2:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g vs. SQL 2005 for supporting ITSM 7.1

 

Thanks Joe,

 

>From my conversation with some internal DBA's and I think the winner is
Oracle 10g due to the superior Replication features.

 

Thank you so much.

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 10:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Oracle 10g vs. SQL 2005 for supporting ITSM 7.1

** 

John,

 

While neither of the databases are 'bad' each has its own advantages or
disadvantages. The biggest advantage of using MS-SQL is that if you do
not have a dedicated DBA, most administration tasks on MS-SQL are doable
by a non DBA with some knowledge of how it all works. Also by default
the database is not case sensitive which makes searching a little more
easier than it is on Oracle that has to be set up as case insensitive.

 

Oracle on the other hand has powerful DBA tools that usually an expert
level DBA can take advantage of. The administration tools available with
Oracle in my opinion are way more powerful than those available with
MS-SQL. So it is definitely the choice of a DB for a bigger shop that
would expect its database to grow up to be ginormous over a few
months/years.

 

At the end of the day look at your available resources and what your
company is willing to invest to take care of that database. If you do
not have Oracle DBA's is your organization willing to spend that extra
80 to 120K a year for one? You definitely do not want Oracle if you do
not have a qualified DBA on site. You can sort of get away with MS-SQL
without one.

 

Joe

 

________________________________

From: "Bilinski, John" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 9:30:07 AM
Subject: Oracle 10g vs. SQL 2005 for supporting ITSM 7.1

** 

Developers and DBA's,

I need your opinion  on which  database softwares would be better suited
to have the Remedy AR System 7.1.0  and the entire ITSM Suite 7.0.3
installed in.  I am not partial to either database software's for I have
used both before but never in a multi-server clustered and replicated
environment like this proposed system. 

 Please, if could give  your opinions for   which database software
would be the best choose for a multi-tiered Remedy server environment
running MS Server 2003 64-bit OS and relying heavily on replication
between 3 databases in a production.  The system may have to support up
to 900 support staff users and 100,000 non-support staff users. Here are
the 2 databases software's we are looking at supporting:

 - Oracle 10g [Enterprise + RAC] 

 - MS SQL 2005 [Enterprise + RAC] 

Thanks  in advance .


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html_____Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are" html___ 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to