Nope, just my attempt at humor. Axton
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc. On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Joe DeSouza <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > If they had one! Do they? I did hear of third party connectors but not > really of a client written by MS.. > > Joe > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Axton <[email protected]> > *To:* [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 4:21:40 PM > *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue > > ** Good thing it's not as inefficient as the sql server client for > unix/linux. > > > Axton Grams > > The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in > this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My > voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a > spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, > Inc. > > On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Joe DeSouza <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> I believe the reason is because of the Oracle Client on Windows is not >> quite as efficient as its UNIX counterpart when it comes to connecting to a >> Remote Oracle Database. >> >> Joe >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From:* Anthony K R <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 3:04:21 PM >> >> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >> >> Slow on windows because of Anti-virus scan? >> >> >> >> -Anthony >> >> >> >> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Joe DeSouza >> *Sent:* Thursday, February 26, 2009 1:22 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >> >> >> >> ** >> >> I have noticed on almost similar configuration (sizewise) that startup >> times on UNIX is considerably better. I had problems on Windows having >> similar configurations in terms of memory etc.. >> >> >> >> Joe >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From:* Lyle Taylor <[email protected]> >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:12:30 PM >> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >> >> Interesting, I think this is the first time that I’ve heard someone >> specifically call out Windows as being part of the problem rather than just >> a remote Oracle database. Your response is actually encouraging, because >> we’re going to be switching over to Linux with the remote Oracle database. >> Hopefully we’ll have better luck there… >> >> >> >> Lyle >> >> >> >> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Joe DeSouza >> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 24, 2009 7:20 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: ARS 7.1 server group issue >> >> >> >> ** >> >> Its a known issue where ARS on Windows connected to a Remote Oracle >> database, takes forever to recache and that it takes forever to restart >> if the services have been stopped and is restarted. This is because of the >> way that data is read in chunks of 100 rows. It is as designed and Remedy >> has nothing to do with the design as its more how the Oracle client >> communicates to remote oracle databases when the client is on Windows.. >> >> >> >> I didn't experience the kinds of problems you are talking about on UNIX >> ARS Servers connected to remote Oracle databases. >> >> >> >> So I guessed your configurations by the symptoms you described. >> Unfortunately you got to live with it unless you decide to move to UNIX. >> >> >> >> Joe >> > > __Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
