Nope.

Take a look at the recommendation on page 5 of this Oracle white paper:

http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_development/pdf/lob_performance_guidelines.pdf

Axton Grams

The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in
this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My
voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a
spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software,
Inc.

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Guillaume Rheault <[email protected]>wrote:

> **
>
> Unfortunately with the BMC ITSM apps, we don't have a choice of not using
> LOBs, right?
> Or do we?
>
> -Guillaume
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Axton
> Sent: Mon 04/27/09 11:42 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Oracle LOB getting very big
>
> Unless explicitly defined when creating a lob, storing the lob out of row
> is
> the default behavior.  I'm guessing the authors wanted to adhere to the
> defaults.  I do know that when performing the ARS installation, the LOB
> storage parameter for the meta-data tables (e.g, arschema) is set to store
> the lob in-row.
>
> Imho, it's better to just not use lobs.
>
> Axton
>
> The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in
> this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My
> voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a
> spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software,
> Inc.
>
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Guillaume Rheault <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>
> > **
> >
> > That is the $60000 question.
> > Seems to me the ARS installer should ask what the value of that setting
> > should be set to
> >
> > -Guillaume
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Misi
> > Mladoniczky
> > Sent: Mon 04/27/09 6:40 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: Oracle LOB getting very big
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thank you all for the responses.
> >
> > One thing confuses me though...
> >
> > In all these comparisons, the In-Row-LOB requires less space and is
> faster.
> >
> > Why has BMC set the default to Out-Row-LOB? Especially since older AR
> > System Versions seems to use the In-Row-LOB setting???
> >
> >         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
> >
> > Products from RRR Scandinavia:
> > * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
> > * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
> > * RRR|Translator - Manage and automate your language translations.
> > Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se
> .
> >
> > > Just for everyone's records, there's also a white paper on the subject:
> > >
> > > 17-Mar-2008     Using Oracle CLOBs with BMC Remedy Action Request
> System
> > > http://documents.bmc.com/supportu/documents/96/63/89663/89663.pdf
> > >
> > > -David J. Easter
> > > Sr. Product Manager, Solution Strategy and Development
> > > BMC Software, Inc.
> > > The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed
> in
> > > this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.  My
> > > voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role
> as
> > > a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC
> > > Software, Inc.
> > >
> > > ________________________________________
> > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> > [email protected]]
> > > On Behalf Of Shellman, David [[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 6:39 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: Oracle LOB getting very big
> > >
> > > Misi,
> > >
> > > I see Axton replied.  He had some good info on this.
> > >
> > > Here is a sql command that BMC/Remedy support gave me to show lob space
> > > allocation
> > >
> > > select substr(s.segment_name,1,30) Lobsegment, l.table_name,
> > > substr(l.column_name,1,12) Column_name, sum(s.bytes/1024/1024) Mbytes
> > > from user_segments s, user_lobs l
> > > where l.segment_name = s.segment_name
> > > having sum(s.bytes/1024/1024) > 100
> > > group by s.segment_name, l.table_name, l.column_name
> > > order by sum(s.bytes/1024/1024);
> > >
> > > Dave
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > > [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> <[email protected]>]
> On Behalf Of Misi
> > Mladoniczky
> > > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 9:02 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: Oracle LOB getting very big
> > >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > Can anyone explain how it can get som MUCH bigger.
> > >
> > > I estimate that the new system took up 3-4 times as much data in the
> > > database, 45+Gb instead of 15Gb.
> > >
> > > The size of the CLOB for the empty 32000-char-field was 12000 bytes per
> > > record, 500Mb for 44000 records... Note that the data was empty on all
> > > rows.
> > >
> > > Does the system allocate empty space for each record in advance???
> > >
> > >         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se
> > >
> > >> By default, 7.x is configured to always store LOB's out of row.  Once
> > >> the
> > >> value is set all forms created after will store in row and out of row
> > >> depending on the data size for that field within the record.
> > >>
> > >> Not all the data is stored in row.  There is a limit where the switch
> is
> > >> made to store out of row for that record.  The issue was that data was
> > >> always stored out of row even if there was space to store the data in
> > >> row.
> > >>
> > >> We were on 7.0.1 for a year or so before we found out about this
> > >> behavior.
> > >>  Under 7.0.1 the size of the instance was growing faster than under
> 6.3.
> > >> We finally identified it was this issue with out of row storage of the
> > >> data.  BMC/Remedy sent me a procedure to switch our data.  I haven't
> run
> > >> it yet.  At this point I think we will wait until we migrate to a new
> > >> server.
> > >>
> > >> If I remember right Rick Cook did a lot of testing of in row and out
> of
> > >> row back under 7.0.1.
> > >>
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > >> [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]> <
> [email protected]>] On Behalf Of Misi
> > Mladoniczky
> > >> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 8:04 AM
> > >> To: [email protected]
> > >> Subject: Re: Oracle LOB getting very big
> > >>
> > >> Thanks David,
> > >>
> > >> That did the trick!
> > >>
> > >> You had to specify this before the forms were created, but we are
> still
> > >> in
> > >> the testing environment, so this is ok.
> > >>
> > >> In this case I guess that the CLOB-data will be stored within the
> actual
> > >> row instead of the external table? Is there a size limit where the
> > >> CLOB-data is stored outside of the row?
> > >>
> > >>         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
> > >>
> > >> Products from RRR Scandinavia:
> > >> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
> > >> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy
> > >> logs.
> > >> * RRR|Translator - Manage and automate your language translations.
> > >> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at
> > >> http://rrr.se.
> > >>
> > >>> Misi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I think you're seeing the in row/out of row issue with storage of
> > >>> LOB's.
> > >>> By default version 7.x stores out of row.  There is a switch so that
> > >>> new
> > >>> forms will store in row.  There is also a conversion routine from
> > >>> BMC/Remedy but I've not been comfortable running it.
> > >>>
> > >>> If your 7.1 server is not in production, you could try setting the in
> > >>> row
> > >>> parameter.  Deleting the form and importing the form definition
> again.
> > >>> Dave
> > >>> -------------------------
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> (Wireless)
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Original Message -----
> > >>> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> > >>> <[email protected]>
> > >>> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > >>> Sent: Fri Apr 24 07:05:27 2009
> > >>> Subject: Oracle LOB getting very big
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> I am moving data from a ARS 6.3.0 server to a 7.1.0 patch 6 server.
> > >>> Both
> > >>> are accessing an Oracle 10 database.
> > >>>
> > >>> In the target server, 3 LOBs are becomming very big. They are
> connected
> > >>> to
> > >>> large text fields (32000 chars) and a diary field.
> > >>>
> > >>> For example one of these text fields has no data in the column for
> any
> > >>> of
> > >>> the 44361 records. The resulting LOB is about 512 Mb in size...
> > >>>
> > >>> In the source 6.3 machine, the size is very small.
> > >>>
> > >>> Has anyone seen anything similar?
> > >>>
> > >>> The real problem is another form with 4 million records, where one
> LOB
> > >>> is
> > >>> 13 Gb in size...
> > >>>
> > >>> I am moving the data with RRR|Chive, which is exactly the same as
> using
> > >>> AR
> > >>> Import of an ARX-file. In other words by doing the API-calls
> > >>> ARGetEntry()
> > >>> and ARMergeEntry().
> > >>>
> > >>>         Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se
> > >>>
> > >>> Products from RRR Scandinavia:
> > >>> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
> > >>> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy
> > >>> logs.
> > >>> * RRR|Translator - Manage and automate your language translations.
> > >>> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at
> > >>> http://rrr.se.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > >>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > >>> Platinum 
> > >>> Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>
> <sponsor%[email protected] 
> <sponsor%[email protected]>>ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers
> > >>> Are"
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > >> Platinum 
> > >> Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>
> <sponsor%[email protected] 
> <sponsor%[email protected]>>ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers
> > >> Are"
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > >> Platinum 
> > >> Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>
> <sponsor%[email protected] 
> <sponsor%[email protected]>>ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers
> > >> Are"
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > > Platinum 
> > > Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>
> <sponsor%[email protected] 
> <sponsor%[email protected]>>ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers Are"
> > >
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > > Platinum 
> > > Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>
> <sponsor%[email protected] 
> <sponsor%[email protected]>>ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers Are"
> > >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > > Platinum 
> > > Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>
> <sponsor%[email protected] 
> <sponsor%[email protected]>>ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers Are"
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> > Platinum 
> > Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>
> <sponsor%[email protected] 
> <sponsor%[email protected]>>ARSlist:
> "Where the Answers Are"
> >
> >   _Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the
> Answers
> > Are"_
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum 
> Sponsor:[email protected]<sponsor%[email protected]>ARSlist: 
> "Where the Answers Are"
>
>   _Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers
> Are"_
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to