i am going to have to side with Shawn no matter what.  i have been
pulling my hair out over SRM and its idiosyncrasies for over 6
months.  harldy anyone knows anything about this application and
support is not always helpful or its "out of the realm of support"

On Jul 8, 6:05 pm, Lyle Taylor <tayl...@ldschurch.org> wrote:
> "foo", "bar" and "foobar" are very commonly used in the field of computer 
> programming and have been around for quite a while.  Take a look at this:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foobar
>
> Lyle
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:53 PM
> To: arsl...@arslist.org
> Subject: Re: Wednesday SRM Humor
>
> **
> I recall when I was learning Perl the book I used always seemed to use $foo 
> and $bar as variable names, and I know there is some other history of 
> spelling it that way, but I'm not really familiar with it like I am the 
> military term fubar.
>
> Shawn
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Lyle Taylor
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:45 PM
> To: arsl...@arslist.org
> Subject: Re: Wednesday SRM Humor
>
> **
> Nice.  :-)  Although, in their defense, they may really have meant FOOBAR and 
> not FUBAR - they're two completely different things.  The fact that the later 
> seems to apply in many cases is beside the point.  ;-)
>
> Lyle
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
> Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 3:35 PM
> To: arsl...@arslist.org
> Subject: Wednesday SRM Humor
>
> **
> I've been troubleshooting a bug in SRM 2.2 patch 2 where you can't relate 
> Change and Incident templates to AOTs.  As a part of my troubleshooting, In 
> my investigations, it appears that BMC hardcoded a field in the search 
> criteria for Incident and Change templates that doesn't exist on either the 
> HPD or CHG Template forms.
>
> However, that field does exist on a form called SRM:SampleAppTemplate.  When 
> I opened that form to look, I saw what BMC's developers really think about 
> the SRM product --  the Assigned Group field on that form has a default value 
> of "FOOBAR".
>
> So we see that not only do BMC developers appear to have a low opinion of 
> their product, but their bugs are not limited to the application itself.  
> Even their spelling of FUBAR is incorrect.
>
> It could be worse though.  At least they're not as bad as Microsoft.  :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn Pierson
> Remedy Developer | Southern Union
>
> Private and confidential as detailed 
> here<http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail>. If you cannot access 
> hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
> _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>
> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
> and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
> copies of the original message.
> _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
> Private and confidential as detailed 
> here<http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail>. If you cannot access 
> hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
> _Platinum Sponsor: rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________­____
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to