** Robert:

I had an issue with the standard memory manager on Solaris for 7.1 a while ago... I am re-posting for your info.  Like Axton said, it may be worthwhile changing your memory manager to "libumem" and re-trying...

Terry

REPOST:

libumem, ITSM 7.0.2 and Solaris Load Testing

Hello everyone:

 

We are currently running ARS 7.1, ITSM 7.0.2 (latest patch) Incident/Change/CMDB/Problem on a high end Solaris box running Solaris 10 with a DB2 database.  We had been conducting stress testing of the application utilizing Loadrunner (yes, we are aware of the limitations of this tool, but were able to get around them) and were previously experiencing exponential degradation of response times once a fixed number of users were logged into the system and performing certain functions (Note: These tests were with the WUT, not MidTier).   These  tests and results were both repeatable and consistent.

 

After working with Remedy engineers on this problem and analyzing various log files and pstack output on the server, they suggested that we replace the default Solaris memory manager with "libumem" as there was extreme memory heap contention by the arsystem process.  Believe it or not, this has fixed our performance issue and the application now scales to the desired number of users without any known problems to date.  With the previous memory manager, we could not get over 130 users logging in over an hour.  With the new memory manager, we were able to get 300+ logged in without the previously experienced exponential degradation.

 

We will continue to do further load testing, however, I would be interested in hearing from anyone out there who has experience using "libumem" on your server to any capacity (development, testing, or production)  Have you come across any issues or hints regarding it's use? 

 

Thank you...

 

Terry



On Apr 6, 2010, Robert Halstead <[email protected]> wrote:

_attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

Reply via email to