As I recall, it seemed to do ok as long as there weren't too many (read: ITSM 7) data elements. That points to a memory/resource issue, possibly involving Java resources. Since it's a 32 bit app., I don't think any tweaks will allow it to run against the load ITSM 7.x would throw at it, though. You'll be better off using one of the other non-BMC tools.
Rick On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Warren Baltimore <[email protected] > wrote: > ** I can't remember. Maybe it was a java related setting in the registry? > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Rick Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ** >> Did it have anything to do with throwing more RAM at the box? Or maybe >> indexing some of the metatables (like activelink and filter)? >> >> Rick >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Warren Baltimore < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ** >>> Folks, I seem to remember some discussion a llllooooooooonnnnnnnnngggg >>> time ago about ways to speed up the Remedy Developer Plus response time. >>> >>> I am running it against an ARSystem 6.3 server (Solaris/Oracle) on a >>> Windows XP laptop. >>> >>> Does this ring a bell with anyone? >>> >>> -- >>> Warren R. Baltimore II >>> Remedy Developer >>> 410-533-5367 >>> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ >>> >> >> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ >> > > > > -- > Warren R. Baltimore II > Remedy Developer > 410-533-5367 > _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
