I understand how Rick put it that the TR is implied so you don't have to specify it but why would including the identifier cause an erroneous result?
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thad K Esser Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: TR vs DB sanity check please ** Tommy, In some situations, your version will evaluate to true, even though nothing changed. To truly detect if a value changed, its best to use: 'AssignedToTech' != 'DB.AssignedToTech' Thad Esser Remedy Developer From: Tommy Morris <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 04/14/2010 01:39 PM Subject: Re: TR vs DB sanity check please Sent by: "Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)" <[email protected]> ________________________________ Instead of Runif: 'AssignedToTech' != 'AssignedToTech' Make it Runif: 'TR.AssignedToTech' != 'DB.AssignedToTech' -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
