On Windows I use Activestate Komodo. I have macros and pre-built
commands to help munge the logs.

On unix I use grep, less, and vi depending on what I'm looking for/doing.

Juan Ingles


On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:59 AM, John Sundberg
<john.sundb...@kineticdata.com> wrote:
> **
> Speaking of logs -- what do people use to read them?
> Does anybody use splunk -- do you like it -- does it help?
> -John
>
>
>
> On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:57 PM, Grooms, Frederick W wrote:
> **
> And since Anne is on Linux she can set up a cron job to archive the logs
> every 5 (or 10) minutes.   I do that currently on production so I can always
> go back a complete day in the logs.
>
> Fred
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] on Behalf Of Benedetto Cantatore
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 3:59 PM
> To: arsl...@arslist.org
> Subject: Re: Log size and server performance
>
> **
> I found 500 megs to be a good size.  I can usually capture what I'm looking
> for within a 10-15 minute window.
>
> Ben Cantatore
> Remedy Manager
> (914) 457-6209
>
> Emerging Health IT
> 3 Odell Plaza
> Yonkers, New York 10701
>>>> anne.ra...@its.nc.gov 04/21/10 12:29 PM >>>
> **
> I ask because I know appending to a 1 G file takes a lot longer (in computer
> time) than appending to a 1 M file.  I was wondering if anyone was aware of
> a practical limit?
>
>
> Anne Ramey
>
> E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North
> Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties only by an
> authorized State Official.
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] on Behalf Of Lyle Taylor
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:09 PM
> To: arsl...@arslist.org
> Subject: Re: Log size and server performance
>
> **
> Well, this isn’t a definitive answer by any means, but my suspicion would be
> that the log file size should be pretty much irrelevant from a performance
> perspective, since it is just appending to the existing file, which is a
> quick operation.  The more important point is that if you’re getting that
> much logging output, just having logging on at all is probably impacting
> performance on the server.  So, if the performance of the system seems
> acceptable with logging turned on, you should be able to let it run as long
> as you want, at least until you either meet you maximum file size or fill up
> the file system you’re logging to without any additional performance impact
> due to the size of the log files.  Now, how to do something useful with such
> large files is another question…
>
> Lyle
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] on Behalf Of Ramey, Anne
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 9:49 AM
> To: arsl...@arslist.org
> Subject: Log size and server performance
>
> **
> We are looking at capturing more effective logging to try and catch some
> interrmittent problems in production that we can't seem to re-produce in
> test.  The problem is that the arfilter log on our server that runs
> escalations is currently 50M and contains about 2 minutes worth of
> information.  This is, obviously, because of the notifications, but I'm
> curious as to what point I can increase my log file sizes before I start to
> see a perfomance hit.  Any ideas/experiences?
>
> ITSM 7.0.03 P9
> ARS 7.1 P6
> Linux
> Oracle
>
> It looks like 100M would catch a 1/2 hour of information or longer in all
> logs except the arfilter (but we have to set all of the log files to the
> same size).  500M might get us a 1/2 hour in the filter log, but the other
> logs will be unnecessarily big and I'm wondering if having all of the logs
> that size could cause server response time to slow?
>
>
> Anne Ramey
>
>
>
>
> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
> --
> John Sundberg
>
> Kinetic Data, Inc.
> "Building a Better Service Experience"
> Recipient of the WWRUG09 Innovator of the Year Award
>
> john.sundb...@kineticdata.com
> 651.556.0930  I  www.kineticdata.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to