With the F5 LTM's you can host hundreds of farms using a single device.

Axton

These statements represent my opinions and nothing more.

On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:07 AM, David Abry <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
>
> So one hardware load balancer can be used for both the ARServer and
> Mid-Tiers?
>
> Thank you all for your response!!
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave Abry
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Axton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> ** When using appliances like F5's LTM, there is no need to purchase
>> multiple load balancers unless you are looking for physical segregation for
>> security reasons or fault tolerance for the load balancers.
>>
>> Axton Grams
>>
>> These statements represent my opinions and nothing more.
>>
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:22 PM, David Abry <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> **
>>>  Hi List,
>>>
>>> We are looking into purchasing a load Balancer for the Mid-Tier and a
>>> second load Balancer for the ARServers. We will be using ITSM 7.6 / 7.5
>>> ARServer in a all Windows 2003 environment.  We are using IIS / Apache
>>> Servlet Engine.  We have a high number of users connecting via the
>>> Mid-Tier...
>>>
>>> I am looking for any recommendations on what customers are currently
>>> using for load balancers as well as success stories.  I know BMC has
>>> recommendations in the "Using a hardware load Balancer 7.1" white paper, but
>>> it would be good to know what has proven to be successful since BMC support
>>> only provides the white paper...
>>>
>>> I have seen on the list that some customers are using F5 BIG-IP.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> V/R,
>>>
>>> David Abry
>>>   _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>>
>>
>>  _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>>
>
> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to