Also,
Check you indexes on things like AR System Message Catalog, and the Help desk 
form.
Our otb Help Desk form had 16 indexes on it (17 if you count entry id).
That will cause slowness on a save.

Danny,
We have been having performance problems as well (same versions too)
Usually it has to do with someone running a bad query and locking the table.
Or fields not getting set, and then a table using an external table 
qualification with an empty field (translates it into 1 = 1)

Any documentation you have I would be very interested in.

Thanks,
Matt P.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Kellett
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 9:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Question on Remedy Performance

**
The AR system is very latency bound. E.g. if your end users have a latency 
above 40ms, then you will start to notice a performance hit.

Also, ITSM applications at that version was not built for performance but 
functionality.

I have done some work on this and I am happy to share some documents with you 
off list. Some of the obvious things that were done include removing the option 
on "Refresh on entry change" on the tables within the incident form. For 
example if I remember there were approx 5 tables, so when you open / select an 
incident, all those refreshed when in reality, you won't want to see the 
financial information every time etc.

Send me an email and I will dig out the docs for you.
dkellett (at) javasystemsolutions.com

Kind regards
Danny Kellett
SSO for ARS
http://www.javasystemsolutions.com/jss/ssoplugin

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jim Coryat (jcoryat)
Sent: 12 May 2010 15:35
To: [email protected]
Subject: Question on Remedy Performance

**
We are running ARS 7.1 patch 006 with ITSM 7.0.03 patch 007.  The applications 
for the most part have been out of the box implementations, we have made some 
customizations but they have been minor in scope.  Our application servers are 
dual 3.0ghz Xeon boxes with 8gb of memory running windows 2003 Enterprise.  The 
database is Oracle 11 on a Sun V440 4 CPU 32gb memory dedicated box.  Both the 
application server and database are on gigabit network connections.  This has 
been bugging me for a while and I can't seem to figure out why the application 
server and database for the most part sit there at an idle, yet we have 
lackluster performance of the remedy system in regards to the customer 
experience on the desktop and web client.  The performance is not terrible, 
however due to the under utilization of the hardware I would expect better 
response than what we are seeing.

What I'm looking for is some pointers or documentation someone might know about 
that would help to identify anything that would be causing this behavior.  I 
have read the scalability white papers published by BMC, which closely mirrors 
our configuration and this has been of little value.

Jim Coryat
Micron Technology Inc.
_attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to