Thank you for the detailed response.

On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Mueller, Doug <doug_muel...@bmc.com> wrote:

> **
> Frank,
>
> The question is a simple one....
>
> Would the users in question need a license (one each) if they were doing
> the operation directly?
>
> If the answer is yes, then there is a problem with your strategy from a
> licensing perspective.  Why?  Because
> you are multiplexing multiple end users on a single login.
>
> What seem to be describing is simply putting another UI in front of the
> user and then gathering the requests
> together in a process and then forwarding them on to the AR System server
> all as a single user with a single
> license.
>
> Not only do you have a license issue, but you loose information like who
> really did the operation (last
> modified by) since everything is done by one user.  So, tracking and
> accountability are lost.  Sure, you could
> always add another field and have that field be updated with the
> information -- but that is further emphasizing
> that you are working around the system and the licensing of the system
> because you are having to take an
> action to perform something which is automatic if you were following the
> licensing rules.
>
> If the operation was only Create or Read, there would not be a licensing
> issue -- although still a tracking
> issue -- but then you could just come in as the different users and not
> have to convert to one shared user
> because there are no licensing issues.
>
> Hopefully, this helps explain how to think about the situation if there is
> a question about whether something
> is OK under the licensing rules.
>
> Doug Mueller
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arsl...@arslist.org] *On Behalf Of *Frank Caruso
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:44 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Shared User ID
>
> ** In the process of setting up an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) to front
> several Remedy web services. Users consuming the services will have the
> ability to create, update and query records through the ESB, which will log
> into ARS using a single user id with a fixed license. I am looking for
> clarification on whether using a single user ID from the ESB to create and
> update records would be a violation of the BMC license agreement. I know in
> the past it was not allowed for such interfaces as a web site (not MidTier)
> but am wondering if using an ESB architecture would be different.
>
> Thank you.
>
> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
> _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to