Didn't the Admin Tool only need Java if you were using Developer Plus? Maybe it is needed for working with web services? I don't remember the Admin Tool having a large dependency on Java.
I have had both Admin Tool and Dev Studio working on the same machine but I don't remember the Java specifics. Most likely I upgrade to the version that Dev Studio needed. Jason On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:51 PM, LJ LongWing <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > Susan, > > I have run both on 1.6 successfully J > > > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Susan Palmer > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:36 PM > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Dev Studio Install: Can I do this on a PC with Admin v7.0.x; > can two java versions be installed? > > > > ** > > Hi Everyone, > > > > I currently have v7.0 Admin on my PC and v7.1 User, our Solaris server > is v7.0.1. > > > > We are preparing a new server with a new v7.5 install (gave up on > upgrade). We do NOT have ITSM. We are custom with leftover Helpdesk v5. > > > > I have the Dev Studio installed on a separate PC with basically nothing > else on it and it works fine. But the display is small so I'd really like > it on my everyday PC. When they said you needed more display space they > weren't kidding. Not sure how some of you manage on laptops! > > > > I thought I'd install it in a completely separate folder structure and that > should keep it separate and I'd be able to run both versions against the > appropriate servers. > > > > During the install of Dev Studio a message let me know I needed a higher > version of Java so I cancelled. I currently have 1.4, it wants 1.5 or > higher. After checking the compatibility chart I notice that my current > admin tool wants 1.4. And I could not find any definite info on Crystal XI > on the PC. > > > > Can I install the v1.5 (5.0) Java in a separate folder and not disrupt my > current admin tool etc since it's pointed to the existing java folder? When > I do the Dev Studio install I can point it to the new v1.5 folder. Do I > need the new folder to have a name that lower in the alphabet than the > existing just to make sure it's not found first? > > > > I'm sure someone has done this and it probably works fine but I'm not > interested in doing a rebuild right now and I need confirmation I'll be OK > as much as possible. My in-house PC expert is on vacation (how dare he) and > I get mixed answers from others. > > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > Susan > > > > Susan Palmer > > ShopperTrak > > 200 W Monroe St 11th Floor > > Chicago, IL 60606 > > 312-529-5325 > > [email protected] > > > > _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
