Hi,

>From a SQL standpoint, an update against a non-existing record would be
wrong. Searching for something that does not exist is OK, but may stop the
AR processing.

The following select is probably done to retrieve value(s) needed in the
Run-If-qualification of the filters in the SET-operation.
SELECT C6 FROM T904 WHERE C1 = '000000001308884'

In other words, the AR Server figures out that something is wrong before
the actual SQL update is done.

        Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se

Products from RRR Scandinavia:
* RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing.
* RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs.
Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se.

> Thanks for the feedback,
>
> I have had faced with a similar issue - a completely different one but
> identical to your example :
> - A script does a Push Fields to a form, but gets ARERR 382.
> - However, the Submit filters are executed after the operation as
> regular.
> - At the end of Phase, "Canceled filter processing due to error"
> appears.
>
> The .log file has the line
> /* UPDATE xxx SET ...
> /*
> /* ROLLBACK
>
> This totally seems to be okay, and supports your example.
>
> On the other hand, the current case has all queries seem to be
> executed successfully - ending with /* OK.
>
> So I cannot see why or which statement fails at all.
>
> BR,
> Koray
>
> On Sep 29, 5:57 pm, LJ LongWing <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Koray,
>> You have your answer right there....or more than likely, somewhere
>> earlier
>> up....but the result is right there.
>>
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK
>>
>> I experience this type of scenario when I issue an out of phase delete
>> of a
>> record that I'm updating...here is my typical scenario
>>
>> I want to delete a record....the easiest way to do a delete is to push
>> to
>> that record and set a 'delete' field to 'yes', and have a filter on that
>> form do a record delete if that flag is yes....
>>
>> Well...if that filter does an out of phase delete (phase 1), when phase
>> 2
>> goes through and tries to update the last mod by and last mod date on
>> the
>> record, that record doesn't exist, and as such, the db throws an error
>> and
>> causes a rollback...
>>
>> I don't know what your scenario is, but something in your processing is
>> causing the db to throw and error and rollback the transaction.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
>>
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of koray
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:47 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Is there any explanation for "Canceled filter processing
>> due to
>> error"?
>>
>> And here is the SQL .log file corresponding to the same process :
>>
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4296 */SELECT C6 FROM T904 WHERE C1 =
>> '000000001308884'
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4317 */OK
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4319 */ROLLBACK WORK
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4697 */COMMIT WORK
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4705 */COMMIT WORK
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3386 */SELECT
>> C1,C2,C3,C4,C5,C6,C7,C8,C112,...
>> > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.3738 */OK
>>
>> On Sep 29, 10:03 am, koray <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>>
>> > I have a weird issue that seems to be happening continously. Below is
>> > a portion from server-side filter .log file that took my attention:
>>
>> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4127 */     End of filter processing
>> (phase
>> 1) -- Operation - SET on ZZZ - AD01589874
>> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4130 */     Restart of filter processing
>> (phase 2) -- Operation - SET on YYY - 000000001308884
>> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4159 */     <Filter Level:0 Number Of
>> Filters:404> Checking "IMSA:MAIN:TASK:Task:Get WIP Task"
>> > >         0: Push Fields -> "IMSA:MAIN:Automated Pending:Task"
>> > >               <deferred from filter IMSA:MAIN:TASK:Task:Get WIP
>> Task>
>> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4189 */     End of filter processing
>> (phase
>> 2) -- Operation - SET on YYY - 000000001308884
>> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:43.4710 */Canceled filter processing due to
>> error
>> > > /* Tue Sep 28 2010 12:24:45.2824 */     Start filter processing
>> (phase
>> 1) -- Operation - SET on XXX - 000000001308884
>>
>> > The message "Canceled filter processing due to error" occurs but there
>> > are no details for it. The whole event restarts after a delay of 2-
>> > to-9 seconds, as seen in this example it was only 2.
>> > My question would be,
>>
>> >         > In which circumstances this message would appear?
>>
>> > Best Regards,
>> > Koray
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> ____
>> > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
>> > attend wwrug10www.wwrug.comARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> _
>> ___
>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
>> attend wwrug10www.wwrug.comARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> ____
>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives atwww.arslist.org
>> attend wwrug10www.wwrug.comARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
> --
> This message was scanned by ESVA and is believed to be clean.
>
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to