My wife would say I'm blessed with selective memory J
Ok.I just confirmed on a test form that I built that if the user has 0% chance of seeing the data, they can't even see the field. If however the field has 'dynamic' field permissions (assignee, assignee group, submitter, etc), then they have a POTENTIAL to access the field depending on the record.so it gives them the field so it doesn't need to re-paint the screen if a record is selected where they do have permissions..so.here it is in a nutshell If the user has ANY chance of EVER putting a value in that field (on submit, or via dynamic permissions), they see the field if they don't have access to the data on that record, they will see the field, but the data will be blank if they don't have access to the field by straight group permissions, and the field doesn't have any dynamic group permissions, they can't see the field or the data good luck.. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2010 11:30 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Change Display of a field to "Edit Masked" ** LJ, How on earth do you REMEMBER all this stuff? :) I just checked and the box is NOT checked and the users without permissions still see the field. Maybe it's the other ways around? (if it IS checked, then they don't see the field or the data?) I'm going to test it. Lisa _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
