Tauf, I would imagine it's to avoid the contention issues that the value was introduced to avoid..why 100?...no clue.it's bigger than 10 which might not solve all of your contention issues if you have extremely high volumes and 100 is a nice round number that's not excessive like 1000 would be.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 11:49 AM To: [email protected] Subject: 7.6.04 Next Request ID block size ** Does anyone know why BMC recommends setting the next request ID block size to 100? Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc. Analyst, Service Management Informatics-Infrastructure Office: 631.858.7765 Mobile:646.483.2779 _____ This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout. _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
