Hi Andrew,

We are currently experiencing the same issue and cannot seem to find an easy
work around. It is All or Nothing with no in between. I hope someone out
there can provide us with something.

Robert

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Andrew C Goodall <[email protected]>wrote:

> **
>
> All,
>
>
>
> We have a dilemma with the current multi-tenancy design of ITSM (we’re
> using ITSM 7.5.01).
>
>
>
> We require multi-tenancy for multiple operating companies to restrict
> access of IT support staff members from seeing incidents in another
> operating company.
>
> However, by implementing multi-tenancy and un-checking unrestricted company
> access causes other unwanted side affects due to Assignee Groups (112)
> permissions, namely the following:
>
>
>
>    1. Incident Management - Users can NOT see all customer companies in
>    the Customer company drop down list. We need or IT support staff to be able
>    to open an incident for any defined customer companies and not just
>    operating companies they have access permissions to.
>    2. Problem Management – Vendor Tab – Vendor Name will not list vendor
>    companies unless you have access permissions to the specified vendor
>    company.
>
>
>
> In a large enterprise scenario with a large centralized service desk it is
> impractical to keep the CTM:people company permissions updated for IT
> support staff in the service desk with access to all Customer and Vendor
> companies.
>
>
>
> Currently my workaround is to use Data Import tool to update assignee
> groups (112) to “Public”, but this is frustrating too, since now I have to
> add this to the process whenever adding customer and vendor companies, as
> well as to the customer and vendor company people.
>
>
>
> Does any one else have this frustration with multi tenancy and non
> “unrestricted” people? Does anybody have any suggestions or know if this
> behavior changes in 7.6.04?
>
>
>
> Does anyone know of a best practice solution for allowing unrestricted
> access to Customer and Vendor companies but not operating companies?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance. In the mean time I’ll open an RFE J
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> *Andrew Goodall*
>
> Software Engineer 2 | Development Services |  jcpenney . www.jcp.com 
> <http://www.jcp.com/>|
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and
> may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the reader of this
> message is not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that your access is unauthorized, and
> any review, dissemination,
> distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete the material
> from any computer.
>
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to