This reminded me -

For those using Remedy User 7.5,  I'll add that the Tech Bulletin for 7.5.00 
patch 007 says it resolved an issue with passwords not being encrypted under 
certain conditions - so I don't know that I'd want to use anything lower than 
007. ( See the readme for details.)

David Durling
Enterprise Information Technology Services
University of Georgia

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gmail
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ARS 7.6.04 Service Pack 1

Client 7.5.04 is the most stable. We just pushed it to our user community
(combo of xp and Win 7) and so far no issues. 7.6.04 kept crashing on us
during our testing prior of packaging the tool.

I have 7.5.04 run in XP compatibility mode.


Regards,
Moe.

-----Original Message-----
From: Terje Moglestue [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 5:08 AM
Subject: Re: ARS 7.6.04 Service Pack 1

I asked some key users to upgrade their BMC User Tool to 7.604p1. Our
production servers is still ARS 75p7 and ITSM 75p1.

The client is not stable it keeps terminating. The user can be working for
5-15-30 minutes. Then - ping - it just terminates. What are they doing?
Using Incident Management Console and/or updating an incident.

Two of my user are running Windows 7, 64 bits. I understand that the client
is not support on that platform.

Another user is running Windows XP Pro 2003, SP3. Same thing - the client
terminates on a regular basis.

I am running Windows 7, 64 bits (java is also 64 bits). My client stable -
sadly that is not the feedback from our user base.

It is not recommended with a different server / client version. I am well
aware of that. The user tool should still not terminate like this.

~
Regards,
Terje

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to