For us it's not a matter of knowing 'who did what'. Since they are VM images, everyone is working on separate copies which then get's merged via passing of def files. If we don't use range of field ID's, we end up with all sorts of conflicts when we merge the forms / workflow.
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 13:09:26 -0700, Jason Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Expanding on the Change History field, I have gotten into the habit of > typing "Created" anytime create a new object. This gives me a reference as > to when the object was created and by who. I like "created" because I can > click into the Change History with my right hand and type it with the left > hand. > > Jason > On Jun 21, 2011 11:13 AM, "Joe Martin D'Souza" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> While field ID's are one way to recognize who done what, its my opinion > that >> the best use of ranges is to identify what application or module or type > of >> data a field might belong to.. For eg 750xx1xxx to 750xx2xxxx would be >> fields pertaining to lets say Sales Order application... >> >> A better way to manage who done what is to have their signatures in the >> Change History. This way (assuming that they do leverage the use of >> change > >> history) you can keep track of changes done and by who for e.g. if a >> field > >> was created by Joe as a Optional field last year but this year Joe made >> it > >> Required on January and then Freddy changed its field label to XYZ on > Feb.. >> >> If they want accountability they would have to accept some discipline and >> leverage the use of something like Change History which I think is best >> suited for tracking purposes right from the inception of an object to its >> extinction.. >> >> Joe >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pritch >> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 1:43 PM Newsgroups: >> public.remedy.arsystem.general >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: changing the next Field ID -- team wants to know >> >> Dev Studio fires workflow? Guess I learned my something new for today >> >> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:41:00 -0700, Rick Cook <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> Just build a custom form that looks at $USER$ and assigns the nextId >>> from >>> the form with a prefix set by the workflow. >>> >>> Rick >>> >>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:17 AM, patrick zandi <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>>> ** I have some Team Members who want to set Field ID;s -- unique for >>>> them.. >>>> --- >>>> 3 Virtuals, with 3 different Admins.. >>>> each admin will have their beginning point of the FeildID's >>>> vice the 536XXX >>>> 777 would be joe >>>> 888 would be pete >>>> 999 would freddy >>>> >>>> >>>> Anyone do this.. >>>> >>>> is it as simple as arschema set nextfieldid = '750000000'; ? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Patrick Zandi >>>> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ >>> >>> >> > _______________________________________________________________________________ >>> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org >>> attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" >> >> > _______________________________________________________________________________ >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org >> attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" >> >> > _______________________________________________________________________________ >> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org >> attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
