I'm using the actual server name. On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Grooms, Frederick W < [email protected]> wrote:
> Are you using the server group name for <server_name> or the actual server > name? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ron Tavares > Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 5:40 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: arsignal -r in a server group > > ** > Looking for some expertise on using this little gadget. > > I have been experimenting with using arsignal -r to recache the servers in > our server group, as an alternate to restarting the ar system service on all > the servers. I'm thinking this will reduce the impact to the end users. > However, in my tests, executing this command hangs the server for about 10 > minutes. Is this normal? Because for that matter, might as well just > restart the service. Is there any advantace to using arsignal instead of a > restart. > > Also, the documentation says to execute as follows arsignal -r > <server_name> where server_name is the name of the server that is to reload > the information, and that you can execute from any server. So, I figure I > can execute it from the admin server, once for each server. But I find > that this does not work, that I have to go to each server, and execute it > from there. Is that correct? > > ARS 7.1 > > Thanks, > .ron > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
