Misi was exactly right. All I want to do is to be able to see the worklog table showing the archived worklog item.
And, Jose, you're right, you shouldn't be creating new fields on the archive form - which makes it EVEN MORE annoying that you can't move the table qualification to point to archive form. However, once you've linked a form to an archive form it does complain if you create new fields on the archive/main form. So there is a bit of error checking stopping you from being too stupid. Kerry On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:41:17 +0100, Jose Huerta <[email protected]> wrote: >But if you change the parent form (add a new field for instance) the >customizations you made on the archived form can be lost. So a "view" (join >form) is a better approach. I talk from the experience of modifying the >audit form and start getting a lot of problems. > >Jose M. Huerta > > > >On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:17, Misi Mladoniczky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> They are surely meant to be used in some way. The main thing would be to >> view and search old archived stuff. >> >> I see no reason why you should not be able to change a table with related >> child-records to be redirected to the archived child-form. Without seeing >> the WorkLog it is hard to get the complete picture of an archived >> Incident. >> >> Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://www.rrr.se (ARSList MVP 2011) >> >> Products from RRR Scandinavia (Best R.O.I. Award at WWRUG10/11): >> * RRR|License - Not enough Remedy licenses? Save money by optimizing. >> * RRR|Log - Performance issues or elusive bugs? Analyze your Remedy logs. >> Find these products, and many free tools and utilities, at http://rrr.se. >> >> > Correct me if I'm worng, but archive form (as audit forms) are not >> > intended >> > to be used. There are in place to be used from other objects (like other >> > forms, reporting, ...). >> > >> > I think that Misi's option was the best: to create a join form. >> > >> > Jose M. Huerta >> > Project Manager** >> > >> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 15:42, Kerry Murdock < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> I was able to delete the table field on the archive form. >> >> Recreate it with a different field ID and only THEN could I change the >> >> form to point to the archive form. >> >> >> >> This seems a shame. If you've got a core archive form you're going to >> >> want >> >> all the tables to be the matching archive forms, surely. >> >> >> >> Ho hum. >> >> >> >> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:36:49 +0100, Misi Mladoniczky <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >Hi, >> >> > >> >> >The only thing I can think of is to create a Self-Join of your main >> >> >Archive-form where ('1' = $1$). >> >> > >> >> >In the join-form created you should be able to change anything not >> >> related >> >> >to database fields, for example the table-field in question. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> >> >> I've got 'case' form which has children 'actions'. >> >> >> I've archived both cases and its actions. >> >> >> >> >> >> I want to change the action table qualification on the archive case >> >> form >> >> >> to point to the archive action form. But whenever I change the table >> >> it >> >> >> just changes it back. Can you not change table forms/qualification >> >> on >> >> an >> >> >> archive form?! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It's a bespoke System using Remedy Server 7.5 patch 4 >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> >> >> Kerry _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
