I've seen these types of situations play out before, and basically what 
generally happens is one of two things:  1) the management of the corporation 
makes some changes to take the wind out of the sails of the activist 
investor(s), or 2) the management of the corporation is replaced by people 
chosen by the activist investors.  It's clear that Elliot Management has no 
interest in what BMC does, and is completely focused on the stock price going 
up so they can sell and make a profit as quickly as possible.  Based on what 
I've seen in the news, it doesn't look like BMC's senior management is budging 
even an inch, and it's likely that folks from Elliot have been focused on 
getting the institutional stock holders on board with a sale.

Personally, I think a sale could be a good thing (or it could be terrible, but 
I prefer to be optimistic.)  Dell, for example, has nothing like BMC's toolset, 
so it wouldn't be a matter of trying to kill off Remedy or anything else if 
they bought it.  IBM I would be a little less positive about since they 
supposedly have a competitor to Remedy with some modules of Tivoli, and Oracle 
is too complex to say one way or another at this point.  In any case, I think 
Remedy itself is a strong enough product someone would have to be extremely 
foolish (like Peregrine's management) to try to get rid of it.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:01 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: BMC proxy fight - Elliot Mgmt

**

I am wondering what Elliott's end game is.  Are they simply trying to make 
stock they own more valuable, or do they have M&A ideas?  Their actions thus 
far could lead in either direction.

Rick
On Jun 20, 2012 9:55 AM, "pritch" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Annual meeting is July 25, so I wouldn't expect any fireworks until around 
then.  The interesting thing is one of the votes on the agenda is:

5. TO VOTE ON A STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY ELLIOTT ASSOCIATES, L.P. AND 
ELLIOTT INTERNATIONAL, L.P. REGARDING THE REPEAL OF PROVISIONS OR AMENDMENTS OF 
THE COMPANY'S AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS, AS SET FORTH IN THE PROXY STATEMENT.

While there's no other details that I can find, I'm assuming this is the repeal 
of the poison pill amendment that was adopted by the board.  Will be 
interesting to see how the stockholders feel.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelly Logan" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 9:11:52 AM
Subject: BMC proxy fight - Elliot Mgmt

**


Regarding the links that Joel noted (see below), does anyone else have some 
insight into the accusations made by Elliot Mgmt? Personally, I'm glad that BMC 
did not completely lose themselves in SaaS, what I see as another 'bubble' 
technology that will be bursting in the next few years as companies realize how 
little value they get from most SaaS vendors, and how much they have to spend 
to do even the most basic customization. What are opinions on the sales and 
other issues? Any sales/partners that would like to chime in on this?



**

This may explain the silence:

http://www.informationweek.com/news/software/infrastructure/240002100

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/bmc-software-responds-to-elliott-managements-letter-2012-05-21

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/elliott-files-definitive-proxy-statement-for-bmc-software-2012-06-14

http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2012/06/12/bmc-software-fights-back-against-elliott-says-its-not-for-sale/



Joel

Joel Sender    [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>     
310.829.5552<tel:310.829.5552>





Kelly Logan , Sr. Systems Administrator (Remedy, Planview), GMS

ProQuest | 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 | Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 
USA | 734.997.4777<tel:734.997.4777>

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

www.proquest.com<http://www.proquest.com>



ProQuest ...Start here. 2010 InformationWeek 500 Top Innovator



P Please consider the environment before printing this email.



This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the sender, and delete the 
message from your computer .

  _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the 
Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at 
www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org>
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com<http://www.wwrug12.com> ARSList: "Where the 
Answers Are"
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

Private and confidential as detailed here: 
http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the 
link, please e-mail sender.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to