FRED:: this is good info.. So then just make your /etc/host only 1 ip till it is installed , then plop in the rest.. I have see something like this on our other server.. it keeps trying to use the -mgt rail in the application.. now I see there is some issue.. .. THANKS !!!
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:37 AM, Grooms, Frederick W < frederick.w.gro...@xo.com> wrote: > I think the problem comes in from a support ticket I opened back with > 7.6.03. The installer has a problem with resolving multiple IPs on a > server so you want the ARS to be listed on the physical (and hopefully > first real IP) in the hosts file > > Fred > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patrick zandi > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 9:24 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: 7.6.04 SP3 -- install problems -- Support said a weird thing.. > > ** let me say it this way.. > is 127.0.0.1 any faster than xx.yy.zz.02 ? no.. it is still in > the/etc/host file (and the resovle conf says resolve files before dns) > so how is this going to make my install any faster and prevent connection > errors.. ... this is that part I am confused on.. > how is 1 ip any faster than the next.. (except that it is dns resolved > from inside which is a call: that is slow).. > > I agree it will not hurt.. it will do nothing.. but it breaks > standardization of configurations.. on all boxes.. which we cannot do > anyways.. > I am cranky.. I need to drink more coffee.. > > > -- > Patrick Zandi > > -----Original Message----- > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Longwing, LJ CTR MDA/IC wrote: > Patrick, > I believe they may be referring to the hosts file on the SERVER, not on > your workstation. While I personally thing this SHOULDN'T be necessary > because of the IP Route table, it certainly wouldn't hurt anything. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of patrick zandi > Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 8:07 AM > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: 7.6.04 SP3 -- install problems -- Support said a weird thing.. > > ** I know I am sleepy, do to lack of it last night.. however this appears > to be preposterous statement.. > > --- > > 1] Server name and fully qualified domain name for the server should be > resolved through hosts file using the ip address 127.0.0.1. > > For example: > > 127.0.0.1 myServerName myServerName.myDomain.com > > ===> HUH? > so now I should make /etc/hosts file to DNS resolve to 127.0.0.1 --- What! > I am confused. > I must be losing my mind ! Why would you point > > 127.0.0.1 HOSTNAME > > ----> so you have 4 Rails correct ? > #1 -- Production VIP xx.yy.zz.02 Remedy <-hostname VIP > Prod -a (teaming) xx.yy.zz.03 Remedy-a > prod - b (teaming) xx.yy.zz.04 Remedy-b > #2 -- Management xx.yy.99.02 Remedy-mgt <-hostname > #3 -- Backup Rail (BUR) xx.yy.55.02 Remedy-bur <- hostname > #4 -- OOB (lights out) xx.yy.77.02 Remedy-lo <--hostname > ---> > > Are they saying to make the production rail 127.0.0.1 --- this sounds > Nuts.. to me.. > > The my Remedy server how do I get to it ? 127.0.0.1 LOL -- Ridiculous.. > > -- > Patrick Zandi > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ > UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org > attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" > -- Patrick Zandi _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
