Correct as long as cache persistence is turned on. In my original reply I wanted to clarify the two technologies mentioned are not involved in the MT caching process at all.
Jason On Jul 30, 2012 7:42 AM, "Rick Cook" <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > But restarting Tomcat wouldn't cause a re-cache of the mid-tier server > from the AR server either, right? It would just have to rebuild its own > cache from the form defs already on the server, right? > > Rick > On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jason Miller <[email protected]>wrote: > >> ** >> >> Restarting Apache or IIS has no impact on MT cache since the cache >> resides within the JSP engine behind either one of these. In our >> environment we can restart Apache during the middle of the day and the >> users can't even tell. The web server is unavailable for a split second and >> when it comes back up it continues passing traffic to Tomcat which retained >> their MT session. >> >> Jason >> On Jul 30, 2012 6:30 AM, "Rick Cook" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> ** >>> My colleagues and I were just talking about restarting a web server, and >>> we were all under the assumption that restarting Apache (or IIS, for that >>> matter) and/or physically bouncing the server would force a re-cache of the >>> Remedy form definitions on the mid-tier server. But as I think of it, I'm >>> not sure that's the case, because it would involve removing the xml files >>> from the server and pulling in a new copy of them. >>> >>> Can someone say definitively whether it does or doesn't? >>> >>> Rick >>> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ >>> >> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ >> > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
