Carl, We just made the descisioni to switch to MS SQL from Oracle due to licensing costs, so I think you are right about that. Having never worked with MS SQL though, I am curious what sort of scalability issues exist? Also, my architect was asking if we needed the Enterprise Edition or if Standard suffices. Why would one be chosen over the other (in the context of ARS, full ITSM suite/CMDB)? Thanks, Thad On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Carl Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> ** > > Hi,**** > > there are still question marks around the scalability of MS SQL, but the > later version have come a long way in a short period of time so if running > the latest supported version of MS SQL there "should" be no issues.**** > > I think the licensing is no killing Oracle as I am seeing a number of > customer move away from this and do to MS SQL (or DB2 - which does not seem > to have as much support from BMC).**** > > ** ** > > Cheers**** > > Carl**** > > ** ** > > http://www.missingpiecessoftware.com/**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Tauf Chowdhury > *Sent:* 05 September 2012 21:43 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Oracle vs. SQL**** > > ** ** > > ** All, > To those of you who have run Remedy on both Oracle and SQL DB, do you have > a preference as to which is better/stable/faster etc..? I know SQL has come > a long way. Any opinions are welcome. > > -- > *Tauf Chowdhury > > * > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ **** > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
