Hi,

I think it is the Form-Final that actually performs the search.

Why not start client-side API-logging and see what happens?

Why not record new macros in the user client? Macros still exists, right?

        Best Regards - Misi, RRR AB, http://rrr.se

>
>
> Thanks Fred,
>
>
>
> That’s what I suspected. I didn’t have too many ‘good macros’ to
> compare as I saw a number of them that had this same ‘problem’. I’m
> suspecting that the client tool is actually running that search twice. I
> haven’t done tests to confirm that but if those instructions appear twice
> within the macro I don’t see how it would perform it only once. I may have
> some clean up to do.
>
>
>
> I have no idea why they have these statements twice – these were perhaps
> developed by end users and not the developer is my best guess. Since the macro
> recording process does not actually display the contents of what it has
> already recorded, it might have been easy for the end user to repeat some
> actions without suspecting the consequence.
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 6:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Suspect actions in a macro..
>
>
>
> I just looked at a couple here (I can’t believe I still had some macros on a
> network share) were in the format of
>
>
>
> Set Working Schema
>
> Perform Query
>
> Form-open
>
> Form-entry-list
>
> Form-final: modify
>
>
>
> So, Yes I believe lines 5 and line 6 are unnecessary and can be deleted.
>
>
>
> Fred
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 4:38 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Suspect actions in a macro..
>
>
>
> **
>
>
>
> When I used armacroed for checking out a macro definition, this is what it
> returned:
>
>
>
> 1) Set Current Working Schema to FormName (ServerName)
>
> 2) Perform Query
>
>      Query bar --  '536871083' >= "$Start Date$" AND '536871083' <= "$End
> Date$" AND '536870932' = "Tier2 Customer Support" AND '7' = "Closed"
>
> 3) ** Unknown command **
>
>    Form-open:
>
> 4) ** Unknown command **
>
>    Form-entry-list: 0
>
> 5) Perform Query
>
>      Query bar --  '536871083' >= "$Start Date$" AND '536871083' <= "$End
> Date$" AND '536870932' = "Tier2 Customer Support" AND '7' = "Closed"
>
> 6) ** Unknown command **
>
>    Form-entry-list: 0
>
> 7) ** Unknown command **
>
>    Form-final: modify☺@
>
>
>
> I find it a little suspicious that the same action/query, is repeated twice.
> Since I did not develop it I cannot say with certainty if this was actually
> recorded twice. I suspect it was. Would this mean that this macro would
> perform that same query twice?
>
>
>
> I am yet to test the run of these macros to log if it actually runs the query
> twice. What do you’ll think? Is line 5 and 6 unnecessary and will repeat the
> query the second time?
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to