I have never seen this issue on 7.5, 7.6.04, 8.0 or 8.1. We use it on all of our servers. Might just be a fluke where one/some of the records got out of whack?
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Gordon Frank <[email protected]> wrote: > ** > > Thanks for the help everyone, > > > > The problem was the "Record Object Relationships" parameter. This is a > development\test server and I had turned this parameter on to trace > workflow on another object. The relationships worked great but it > apparently takes some load on the system and causes the "unique index" > error I got when saving the Active Link. > > > > Once I turned off "Record Object Relationships" I was able to save again. > I had Development Cache Mode turned on as well. I will probably open a BMC > Tech Support ticket on this just to see what they say. > > > > Does anyone know if this has been fixed in 8.1? We are at 7.6.4 and will > soon migrate to 8.1. > > > > I can live with doing "Record Object Relationships" on demand and restart > the server, but it is ackward. > > > > Thanks again and if I hear anything else, I'll let you know > > > > Gordon Frank > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Frederick W Grooms" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Friday, August 9, 2013 5:58:27 PM > > *Subject: *Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that > has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link > (UNCLASSIFIED) > > ** > > If you have “mucked” about in the object relationships at the database > you need to bounce your system > > > > For some reason BMC chose not to use the same logic as next entry id for a > form and instead reads the last relationship ID at startup. The server > then uses an internal counter to increment the entry ID for the > relationships. I suspect they do the same for the other meta data. > > > > Fred > > > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Longwing, Lj > *Sent:* Friday, August 09, 2013 4:19 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that > has been defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link > (UNCLASSIFIED) > > > > ** > > were you saving a Form or an Active Link?...I still recommend turning on > SQL logging to figure out what form has the unique index it's complaining > about. I have personally come across this when saving a form, on the > unique index on schema_index on overlaid forms.. > > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:16 PM, gjjmss wrote: > > ** > > We got this just renaming a button > > > > Gordon > > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone. > > > > ------ Original message ------ > > If you don't see that active link name in the list of active links, there > could be a cache problem. I've had similar things happen where I had to > remove the cache in the Dev Studio workspace and then log back into the > server and bring the list back up. > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Rick Cook" > > > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 3:30:08 PM > > Subject: Re: The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been > defined for this form, 382 when saving an Active Link (UNCLASSIFIED) > > > > ** > > Like LJ said, it's not Java. There is, in the metadata, an Active Link with > the same name as the one you're saving. I did think about the possibility > that an action in the Active Link might cause that error, but I don't think > so. Only adding a Unique attribute to an index would give you that if it > were anything but a duplicate AL name. > > > > Rick > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Gordon Frank < [email protected] > wrote: > > > > > > ** > > > > > > Sorry, I forgot to change the subject line on the original > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected] ] > > Sent: Friday, August 09, 2013 3:18 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: Frank, Gordon M CTR (US) > > Subject: Re: SLM 7.6.04 Service Target Milestones not appearing on Incident > > > > Has anybody seen this: > > > > > > > > The value(s) for this entry violate a unique index that has been defined for > > this form, 382, > > > > > > > > When trying to save an Active Link within Developer Studio 7.6.4? > > > > > > > > I get a feeling its a Java issue. > > > > > > > > If you know the correction, I would appreciate the feedback. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Gordon Frank > > > > > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > > Caveats: NONE > > > > > > > > > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ > _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
