During RUG, I was told that a hotfix will be coming soon to address the 
flushing action of the mid-tier (base line on 7.6.4).

Just an FYI..

hbr

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:14 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arslist] Controlling the Flushing action of the Mid-Tier Cache

Actually I have seen that behavior too on 7.6.04 Patch 004 where I noticed the 
time it takes to flush the entire cache is not that significantly more than 
using the Sync Cache.

My reasoning why that must be as it is, is that it still takes the system a 
little bit of time to figure out what has changed. Sure the searches for this 
might be optimized, but it's still a search to identify what needs to be 
flushed. Even if the search takes only a minute, its still a minute more.

I'm guessing it takes a little more than a minute to identify what's changed. 
On an average I have noticed that a Sync Cache operation takes anywhere around 
5 minutes or upwards.

The benefit of telling the Mid-Tier what to cache upfront, eliminates the need 
for the Mid-Tier to search what it needs to cache.

PLUS while stuff is still being developed, there's a chance you do not want to 
cache everything you just developed as you are still R&D'ing it. So as a 
developer if I want to cache just a single object or a selected list of objects 
but not the rest that are newly created, I think it would be a huge win if I 
could have that.

I think the Flush Cache and / or the Sync Cache operations are more ideal for 
end of development cycles or end of day operations. Not middle of the day when 
you have a team of developers who didn't want the MT cache flushed waiting on 
it to finish its work. The single object flush idea would be ideal for middle 
of the day use where you do not impact other users or developers..

Cheers

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION 
OPERATIONS
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 12:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Controlling the Flushing action of the Mid-Tier Cache

We are on 7.6.04 sp2.  I'll keep playing with it and see if I can get it to 
work for me.  I'll try clearing the browser cache, etc.  

Lisa

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 11:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Controlling the Flushing action of the Mid-Tier Cache

**
What version are you using?  I think sync cache has matured a bit since it was 
first introduced.  On 8.0 I am constantly using it to see form and AL updates.

One trick is you need to either clear your browser cache or force a cache 
refresh by using CTRL + F5.  Also in the past I have noticed some issues where 
changed objects being displayed via an inline panel are not easily refreshed.  
In that case I keep the form itself open in a tab and force the cache refresh 
on the form itself before trying it inline.

Jason


On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Kemes, Lisa A DLA CTR INFORMATION OPERATIONS 
<[email protected]> wrote:


        I agree, I tried using the Sync Cache feature and it's good for forms
        and fields, but not for workflow.  I waited and waited for my workflow
        (active links) to refresh and after about 20 minutes, I just flushed the
        entire cache and only then did I see my new workflow kick off.
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
        [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
        Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 6:04 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: RFE: Controlling the Flushing action of the Mid-Tier Cache
        
        **
        
        Currently the flushing action of the Mid-Tier Cache is limited to either
        flushing the entire cache (HUGE performance hit) or using the new Sync
        Cache feature (relatively less of a performance hit).
        
        
        
        It would be nice if there was another layer of control over what a
        developer or a Mid-Tier administrator would have liked to flush.
And
        that is the ability to flush an individual object - Just the Form, or
        just one Active Link, or just one Form Menu, etc. or a selected list of
        these.
        
        
        
        The Sync Cache feature already having been built, whose functionality I
        was a little confused over because it still takes a ton of time to
        happen, I would not think going one layer deeper would be that much more
        difficult, and flush just selected objects.
        
        
        
        This could be implemented both on the Mid-Tier configuration application
        
        
        
        OR
        
        
        
        Even better on the Developer Studio itself. The Developer Studio can
        already store information of various Mid-Tier servers associated with
        various AR Servers from various environments such as Development, Test,
        QA, Staging, Production etc. in its Mid-Tier servers Information. It
        already has the ability to view a form through a browser utility. In
        version 8 it has even gone a step further to model permissions you want
        to view the form with. Below is a screen shot of a limited version of
        this functionality in 7.6.04..
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        It would be nice to be able to right click on a newly created menu, and
        perform a Cache on Selected Mid-Tier Server and offer the developer a
        choice of valid servers associated with that environment that he would
        like to flush the cache without leaving the Developer Studio and choose
        single objects or a finite list of objects to flush instead of having
        the Sync cache flush all the recently developed objects, which may not
        be what he wants to do.
        
        
        
        In my opinion this would be less time consuming that even the Sync
        feature, and will give the developer a better control on what they are
        ready to publish as finished code to the user.
        
        
        
        I would like to know what you'll think of this one too.
        
        
        
        I have yet another couple of ideas I spoke to engineering about that I
        was asked to post on here so it could be run by the community.
        
        
        
        Please visit the community area to vote on this one
        <https://communities.bmc.com/ideas/3588>  if you like it at
        https://communities.bmc.com/ideas/3588.
        
        
        
        Cheers
        
        
        
        Joe D'Souza

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers 
Are, and have been for 20 years"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to