I guess I don't know why someone *wouldn't* be using AREA for the bulk of their 
users in Remedy to begin with.  It's a waste of money for an organization to 
have dedicated Remedy people (which we all know aren't cheap) sitting around 
resetting passwords and dealing with credentials.  It also closes major 
security holes by allowing you to have a unified security policy including 
password strength, bad password attempts, etc.  From my perspective, having 
dedicated passwords in Remedy is not a best practice and not something that 
should get beyond the proof of concept phase of a Remedy implementation.  I'm 
sure someone has a good reason why they would need to not create an account in 
AD for each Remedy user, but I haven't heard it yet and I could probably come 
up with some good arguments against their reasoning.  Of course, I exclude 
accounts used by the Remedy team or integrations and such but those are 
exceptions rather than the standard.

So for me, any enhancements made to enforcing password rules in Remedy or 
anything like that would serve no value.  I don't know if BMC has any 
statistics on how many of their customers use AREA to authenticate for their 
Remedy systems but I'd think it's the majority.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Baker
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Target Attack and BMC Software ITSM?

Fred: Sadly, setting a predictable password isn't going to stop a slow 'drip 
drip' process enumerating passwords.

John: The core problem, as is the case with much of AR System, is an 
unwillingness to tackle design changes in the correct place. You are correct 
that security should happen in the server, hence it should check the disabled 
user radio. How much effort is that - about ten minutes with an if statement?

I firmly believe in getting the core product right. I think I'm in a minority. 
:)

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers 
Are, and have been for 20 years"

Private and confidential as detailed here: 
http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx .  If you cannot access the 
link, please e-mail sender.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to