For the purpose of keeping the inventory of your Filters to a lower number, you could have it in a single Filter with multiple actions, the beginning action(s) could manipulate the value as you need them to be, and the succeeding actions in that same object, trigger the notification action using the manipulated value.
Pretty much what Rod said actually, but if your question was, does it need to be in a separate Filter - the answer is no. It should just maintain a linear chronology, and each action will fire in the same linear sequence they are defined in, as they all belong to a single Filter. IF HOWEVER the values you are manipulating, exist in a display only field, as the notification process is differed to a later stage, if you need that notification action to retain the manipulated value during runtime, you would then need to bypass Filter phasing, and have it execute in the order that you created those actions, immediately without differing them using the `! characters in the naming convention. Or use an additional action Application-Pending-Release command action, immediately following the notification action, as I believe it would do the same thing, if you do not want to be bound by a naming convention, in case a change of code is required later. Cheers Joe -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of shashidhar M S Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 3:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Query regarding SUBSTR() function Hi Rod, Yes I understand that. Many Thanks for the information!! Cheers, Shashi _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org "Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"
